Table 2. Side chain repacking results for seven scaffolds.
PDB | Hydrogen bonds | Binding energy (Proda energy units) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Native | Minimal | Complex | Native | Minimal | Complex | |
1c2t | 13 | 5 (38%) | 13 (100%) | -68.48 | 38.07 | -69.30 |
1dqx | 19 | 3 (16%) | 17 (89%) | -52.35 | 30.67 | -54.10 |
1h2j | 13 | 3 (23%) | 10 (77%) | -37.72 | 144.61 | -40.15 |
1jcl | 11 | 4 (36%) | 11 (100%) | -30.33 | 35.20 | -28.01 |
1ney | 14 | 8 (57%) | 11 (79%) | -42.98 | -18.93 | -39.10 |
1oex | 9 | 6 (67%) | 9 (100%) | -57.80 | -18.28 | -53.86 |
3vgc | 9 | 8 (89%) | 9 (100%) | -30.31 | 31.77 | -30.45 |
Total | 88 | 37 (42%) | 80 (91%) | - | - | - |
The columns “Native”, “Minimal”, and “Complex” shows results calculated by TS in the crystal structures, matched TS based on the complex active site model and the minimal active site model, respectively.