Skip to main content
. 2016 May 23;11:721–731. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S103521

Table 3.

CIMT in male and female patients

All participants (N=256)
P-value
Females (n=134) Males (n=122) F vs M
CIMT 0.54 (0.51–0.57) 0.60 (0.57–0.68) P=0.011
 Group 1 (<45 years) 0.48 (0.45–0.53) 0.48 (0.45–0.54) P=0.861
 Group 2 (45–60 years) 0.51 (0.51–0.58) 0.63 (0.56–0.70) P=0.005
 Group 3 (>60 years) 0.63 (0.56–0.71) 0.72 (0.68–0.77) P=0.020
   ∆ 2−1 = group 2 – group 1 +0.03 +0.15
   Group 2 vs group 1 P=0.013 P<0.001
   ∆ 3−2 = group 3 – group 2 +0.12 +0.09
   Group 3 vs group 2 P=0.001 P=0.005
   ∆3−1 = group 3 – group 1 +0.15 +0.24
   Group 3 vs group 1 P<0.001 P<0.001

Notes:2−1, difference between age groups 2 and 1; ∆3−2, difference between age groups 3 and 2; ∆3−1, difference between age groups 3 and 1. Data presented as median (95% confidence interval). Data in bold indicates statistical significance.

Abbreviations: F, females; M, males; CIMT, carotid intima–media thickness; BMI, body mass index.