Table 5.
| Experimentally determined d (nm) | JCPDS value of d for Wcx (nm) | hkl | Ratio d (exper.)/d (JCPDS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| b | 0.461 | 200 | |
| b | 0.415 | 112 | |
| b | 0.401 | 103 | |
| b | 0.348 | 210 | |
| 0.246±0.004c | 0.2455 | 222 | 1.00 |
| 0.228±0.004c | 0.2283 | 400 | 1.00 |
| 0.197±0.004c | 0.2001 | 410 | 0.98 |
| 0.144±0.004c | 0.1416 | 208 | 1.02 |
| 0.133±0.004c | 0.1309 | 700;350 | 1.02 |
| 0.124±0.004c | 0.1228 | 256 | 1.01 |
Those reflections corresponding to silver (the high-resolution TEM lattice standard) are excluded; but all others are reported in this table.
It was not possible to observe reflections with indices lower than 222, since they were obscured by the graphite 002 reflections.
The expanded uncertainty U = 2uc in the measured d-spacings was calculated from the standard deviations in the camera constant and in the measurement of the diameters of the experimental rings. The mean and the standard deviation of the camera constant were determined from five measurements each of the diameters of the first seven rings in a SAD pattern from a microcrystalline aluminum standard. The mean and standard deviation of the SAD rings of the experimental sample were determined from three to five measurements of the diameters.