Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Nutr. 2008 Mar;138(3):469–475. doi: 10.1093/jn/138.3.469

TABLE 1.

Cell cycle phase distribution of CGN-exposed and unexposed NCM460 cells1

2 d
4 d
6 d
8 d
CGN Control CGN Control CGN Control CGN Control
Attached cells %
 G0-G1 86.4 ± 0.3 86.0 ± 0.8 83.4 ± 1.0 81.0 ± 0.4 69.8 ± 0.1 85.7 ± 0.2 70.4 ± 1.0 86.5 ± 0.5
 S   5.5 ± 0.4   5.4 ± 0.4   7.9 ± 0.5   9.5 ± 0.01 12.1 ± 0.2   5.4 ± 0.3 11.2 ± 0.2   5.7 ± 0.5
 G2-M   4.4 ± 0.04   4.2 ± 0.1   5.9 ± 0.3   6.7 ± 0.4   8.3 ± 0.06   4.9 ± 0.4   8.4 ± 0.2   3.8 ± 0.4
 Sub-G0   2.1 ± 0.7   3.0 ± 0.2   1.6 ± 0.8   1.2 ± 0.7   6.7 ± 0.5   2.6 ± 0.1   6.9 ± 1.3   2.8 ± 0.5
Detached cells
 G0-G1 62.8 ± 2.3 56.3 ± 1.7 59.8 ± 2.7 58.8 ± 1.0
 S   8.3 ± 0.01 10.8 ± 0.5   9.2 ± 1.0 10.2 ± 0.4
 G2-M   9.2 ± 0.6   8.1 ± 0.9   9.0 ± 0.6   7.0 ± 1.0
 Sub-G0 11.9 ± 0.5 18.5 ± 0.6 15.3 ± 2.8 18.4 ± 1.5
1

Values are means ± SD of 2 independent measurements, each of which measured >10,000 cells in the attached cells, and 5000–10,000 in the detached cells. Differences between CGN-exposed and control cells were significant at d 6 and 8 for the G0-G1, S, and G2-M cell cycle phases, P < 0.001; 1-way ANOVA with Tukey-Kramer post test, and for the sub-G0 phase, P < 0.01. In the detached cells, only the difference in CGN-treated vs. control cells in S-phase on d 6 achieved significance, P < 0.05.