Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr;45(4):409–422.

Table 3:

Meta-analysis results for prevalence of each mycoplasma species in included studies

Mycoplasma species* Number of studies Sex Prevalence rate (%) (95% CI) Heterogeneity test Begg’s test ***P-value (two-tailed) Egger’s test **** P-value (two-tailed)
Min Max Pooled ** (range)
a b
I2 (%) P-value
M. genitalium 5 M 2.0 37.8 10.7 (4.6–22.9) 90.6 <0.001 1.0 1.0 0.4
6 F 2.0 22.7 6.2 (3.1–11.8) 81.6 <0.001 0.9 1.0 0.5
M. hominis 5 M 3.0 22.4 15.3 (10.6–21.7) 70.4 0.009 0.3 0.5 0.2
11 F 2.9 27.2 12.2 (8.8–16.8) 89.5 <0.001 0.4 0.4 0.04
U. urealyticum 6 M 5.0 40.5 11.5 (4.9–25) 96.1 <0.001 0.06 0.02 0.009
10 F 7.7 44.3 18.9 (12.7–27.2) 95.0 <0.001 0.3 0.4 0.1
All species 17 M 2.0 40.5 11.1 (7.4–16.4) 92.4 <0.001 0.01 0.02 <0.001
27 F 2.0 44.3 12.8 (9.8–16.5) 93.3 <0.001 0.009 0.009 <0.001

M: male; F: female; Min: minimum; Max: maximum; a: Kendall’s tau without continuity correction; b: Kendall’s tau with continuity correction.

*

There was only one article studied the prevalence of U. parvum and reported its prevalence to be 2% and 3% in fertile and infertile men, respectively;

**

Pooled prevalence (based on random effects);

***

Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation;

****

Egger’s regression intercept.