Table 5.
Estimates of AUC-ROC and AUC-PR of different methods for imbalanced dataset in predicting donor splice sites using human, bovine, fish and worm species
Species | Approaches | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MM1-SVM | LIK-SVM | WD-SVM | WDS-SVM | EFFECT | Proposed | ||
AUC-ROC | Human | 97.32 | 97.61 | 97.73 | 97.30 | 97.42 | 97.21 |
Bovine | 97.57 | 97.89 | 97.93 | 97.65 | 97.70 | 97.45 | |
Fish | 97.71 | 97.85 | 97.92 | 97.77 | 97.57 | 97.41 | |
Worm | 97.99 | 98.26 | 98.51 | 98.30 | 98.45 | 98.06 | |
AUC-PR | Human | 89.95 | 92.23 | 92.36 | 92.17 | 92.41 | 93.24 |
Bovine | 90.02 | 92.13 | 92.39 | 92.16 | 92.42 | 93.34 | |
Fish | 90.10 | 92.18 | 92.43 | 92.26 | 92.47 | 93.38 | |
Worm | 89.10 | 90.27 | 90.89 | 91.53 | 91.67 | 92.29 |
It can be seen that the values of AUC-ROC of proposed approach are at par with that of others, whereas the values of AUC-PR for the proposed approach are little higher than that of other approaches, in all the four species