Table 3.
Pairwise comparison of the intervention arms using mixed effects multivariate linear regression model based on zinc, ORS and joint adherence, Jan-Mar 2015
| Pairwise combination | P value | β coefficient a |
|---|---|---|
| Zinc adherence (%) | ||
| Central bundling vs HC level bundling | 0.894 | −0.4 |
| Central bundling vs Bundling without message | 0.001* | 13.5 |
| Central bundling vs Status quo | <0.001* | 17.6 |
| HC level bundling vs Bundling without message | 0.002* | 14.1 |
| HC level bundling vs Status quo | <0.001* | 19.4 |
| Bundling without message vs Status quo | 0.319 | 4.2 |
| ORS adherence (%) | ||
| Central bundling vs HC level bundling | 0.969 | 0.2 |
| Central bundling vs Bundling without message | 0.007* | 11.5 |
| Central bundling vs Status quo | <0.001* | 12.0 |
| HC level bundling vs Bundling without message | 0.022* | 10.2 |
| HC level bundling vs Status quo | 0.003* | 12.1 |
| Bundling without message vs Status quo | 0.966 | −0.3 |
| Joint zinc and ORS adherence (%) | ||
| Central bundling vs HC level bundling | 0.965 | −0.1 |
| Central bundling vs Bundling without message | 0.002* | 12.6 |
| Central bundling vs Status quo | <0.001* | 14.8 |
| HC level bundling vs Bundling without message | <0.001* | 12.0 |
| HC level bundling vs Status quo | <0.001* | 15.7 |
| Bundling without message vs Status quo | 0.673 | 1.8 |
* Statistically significant association at p value of 0.05
a Unstandardized multiple linear regression coefficient adjusted for number of episodes of diarrhea and level of severity of dehydration