Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neural Eng. 2016 Apr 21;13(3):036011. doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/3/036011

Table 1.

Performance metrics of HMM-Gaussian, feature-based, and Kaggle-winning methods.

Dog Method FN FP (rate/hr) Latency (s)
1 HMM-Gaussian 0 5 (6.2e-4) −12.1 ± 6.9
1 Feature 0 116 (1.4e-2) −18.5 ± 4.9
1 Feature* 0 71 (8.8e-3) −15.7 ± 3.8
1 Kaggle 0 3 (3.7e-4) −10.1 ± 5.5
2 HMM-Gaussian 0 6 (4.6e-3) −10.7 ± 8.1
2 Feature 2 (0.057) 430 (0.33) −19.0 ± 12.7
2 Feature* 2 (0.057) 232 (0.18) −15.6 ± 5.1
2 Kaggle 0 7 (5.4e-3) −8.6 ± 4.2

Feature* indicates that the method was trained specifically to limit false positives during bursts.

FN = false negatives (missed seizures); FP = false positives. Latency is measured relative to UEO.