Table 1.
Performance metrics of HMM-Gaussian, feature-based, and Kaggle-winning methods.
| Dog | Method | FN | FP (rate/hr) | Latency (s) | 
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HMM-Gaussian | 0 | 5 (6.2e-4) | −12.1 ± 6.9 | 
| 1 | Feature | 0 | 116 (1.4e-2) | −18.5 ± 4.9 | 
| 1 | Feature* | 0 | 71 (8.8e-3) | −15.7 ± 3.8 | 
| 1 | Kaggle | 0 | 3 (3.7e-4) | −10.1 ± 5.5 | 
| 2 | HMM-Gaussian | 0 | 6 (4.6e-3) | −10.7 ± 8.1 | 
| 2 | Feature | 2 (0.057) | 430 (0.33) | −19.0 ± 12.7 | 
| 2 | Feature* | 2 (0.057) | 232 (0.18) | −15.6 ± 5.1 | 
| 2 | Kaggle | 0 | 7 (5.4e-3) | −8.6 ± 4.2 | 
Feature* indicates that the method was trained specifically to limit false positives during bursts.
FN = false negatives (missed seizures); FP = false positives. Latency is measured relative to UEO.