Skip to main content
. 2016 May 12;5(5):e002941. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.115.002941

Table 4.

Age‐ and Sex‐Adjusted Differences in Adolescent Cardiovascular Risk Factors Between Participants With a GSM ≥75th Percentile and CIMT ≤25th Percentile (High GSM/Low CIMT) and Participants With a GSM ≤25th Percentile and CIMT ≥75th Percentile (Low GSM/High CIMT)

High GSM/Low CIMT (n=70) Low GSM/High CIMT (n=65) Age and Sex Adjusted Difference*, c P Valuea
Adolescent age (y), mean (±SD), b 13.4 (1.2) 13.5 (1.1) 0.07 (−0.33, 0.46) 0.74
Sex (men), n (%), b 32 (45.7) 39 (60.0) 1.16 (0.93, 1.45) 0.47
Adolescent SBP (mm Hg), mean (±SD) 108.1 (11.5) 112.7 (12.9) 3.89 (−1.00×10−3, 7.79) 0.05
Adolescent BMI (kg/m2), median (IQR) 17.6 (16.1, 19.4) 19.5 (17.3, 21.0) 1.97 (0.95, 2.99) <0.001

BMI indicates body mass index; CIMT, carotid intima‐media thickness; GSM, gray‐scale median; IQR, interquartile range; SBP, systolic blood pressure.

*Values are betas (†) and odds ratios (‡) reflecting the adolescent age and sex‐adjusted difference in adolescent cardiovascular risk factor levels between both groups with 95% CIs.

a

P‐value of model.

b

The regression coefficients for adolescent age and sex are only adjusted for sex and adolescent age, respectively.

c

Reference category: High GSM/low CIMT group.