Table 7.
Arch type | Material | Outcome |
Total n (%) |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Success n (%) |
Failure n (%) |
|||
Maxilla | DFC | 103 (82) | 22 (18) | 125 (48) |
MTA | 131 (98) | 3 (2) | 134 (52) | |
Mandible | DFC | 178 (80) | 45 (20) | 223 (51) |
MTA | 196 (92) | 16 (8) | 212 (49) | |
| ||||
Maxilla DFC vs GMTA: FET <0.01† | ||||
Mandible DFC vs GMTA: FET <0.01† | ||||
DFC maxilla vs mandible: chi-square (1 df)=0.66, FET=0.67 | ||||
GMTA maxilla vs mandible: FET=0.05 | ||||
| ||||
First | DFC | 152 (84) | 28 (16) | 180 (56) |
MTA | 136 (96) | 6 (4) | 142 (44) | |
Second | DFC | 129 (77) | 39 (23) | 168 (45) |
MTA | 191 (94) | 13 (6) | 204 (55) | |
| ||||
First molar DFC vs GMTA: chi-square (1 df) <0.01, † FET <0.01† | ||||
Second molar DFC vs GMTA: chi-square (1 df) <0.01, † FET <0.01† | ||||
DFC first vs second: chi-square (1 df)=0.09, FET=0.08 | ||||
GMTA first vs second: chi-square (1 df)=0.53, FET=0.48 | ||||
| ||||
Female | DFC | 132 (80) | 32 (20) | 164 (48) |
GMTA | 170 (97) | 6 (3) | 176 (52) | |
Male | DFC | 149 (81) | 35 (19) | 184 (52) |
GMTA | 157 (92) | 13 (8) | 170 (48) | |
| ||||
Female DFC vs GMTA: chi-square (1 df) <0.01, † FET <0.01† | ||||
Male DFC vs GMTA: chi-square (1 df) <0.01, † FET <0.01† | ||||
DFC female vs male: chi-square (1 df)=0.91, FET=0.1 | ||||
GMTA female vs male: chi-square (1 df)=0.14, FET=0.10 | ||||
| ||||
Clinic | DFC | 230 (84) | 45 (16) | 275 (49) |
MTA | 271 (95) | 14 (5) | 285 (51) | |
Operating room | DFC | 51 (70) | 22 (30) | 73 (54) |
MTA | 56 (92) | 5 (8) | 61 (46) | |
| ||||
Clinic DFC vs GMTA: chi-square (1 df) <0.01, † FET <0.01† | ||||
Operating room DFC vs GMTA: chi-square (1 df) <0.01, † FET <0.01† | ||||
DFC clinic vs operating room: chi-square (1 df) <0.01, † FET <0.01† | ||||
GMTA clinic vs operating room: chi-square (1 df) <0.48, FET <0.35 |
Chi-square=Pearson, 2-tailed; 1 df=1 degree of freedom; FET=Fisher’s exact test, 2-tailed; DFC=diluted formocresol; GMTA=gray mineral trioxide aggregate.
Statistically significant at the P<.05 level.