Table S1.
Results of analyses excluding the alert call playback condition testing for a possible effect of recruitment call version
| Model | AICc | df | Fixed effects | χ2 | P value | N |
| Proportion of group vigilant | ||||||
| Basic model: treatment + version + treatment × version | 132.6 | 8 | ||||
| Intercept model | 162.3 | 3 | ||||
| Best model: treatment | 129.2 | 5 | Treatment | 38.0 | <0.01 | 48 |
| Latency to resume normal behavior | ||||||
| Basic model: treatment + version + treatment × version | 187.4 | 8 | Treatment | 27.7 | <0.001 | 48 |
| Version | 6.5 | 0.13 | 48 | |||
| Treatment × version | 5.4 | 0.11 | 48 | |||
| Intercept model | 202.6 | 3 | ||||
| Best model: treatment | 185.6 | 5 | Treatment | 21.9 | <0.001 | 48 |
| Movement behavior | ||||||
| Basic model: treatment + time + version + treatment × time | 181.6 | 9 | Treatment | 56.5 | <0.001 | 282 |
| Time | 27.5 | <0.001 | 282 | |||
| Treatment × time | 13.4 | 0.001 | 282 | |||
| Version | 1.5 | 0.26 | 282 | |||
| Intercept model | 239.8 | 3 | ||||
| Best model: treatment + time + treatment × time | 181.0 | 8 | Treatment | 56.3 | <0.001 | 282 |
| Time | 27.6 | <0.001 | 282 | |||
| Treatment × time | 13.3 | 0.001 | 282 |
Basic models included all fixed and random effects, intercept models included only the random effects, and best models included only the significant fixed effects based on AICc selection as well as the random effects. Listed fixed effects represent the test statistics of the factors that were, according to the model selection, significant. Playback experiments were conducted on 16 groups, with each group receiving all playback treatments.