Table S2.
Post-hoc analyses of playback experiment
| Contrast | 2.5% | 97.5% |
| Movement behavior | ||
| SD_(intercept)|group | 0.04* | 0.14* |
| σ | 0.25* | 0.30* |
| A | 5.34* | 5.56* |
| A vs. R | −0.15 | 0.13 |
| A vs. M | −0.21 | 0.07 |
| A vs. CR | −0.15 | 0.14 |
| Time | −0.02 | 0.04 |
| A × time vs. R × time | −0.09* | 0.00* |
| A × time vs. M × time | −0.15* | −0.06* |
| A × time vs. CR × time | −0.06 | 0.04 |
| SD_(intercept)|group | 0.04* | 0.14* |
| σ | 0.25* | 0.30* |
| R | 5.33* | 5.55* |
| R vs. A | −0.12 | 0.16 |
| R vs. M | −0.21 | 0.08 |
| R vs. CR | −0.13 | 0.15 |
| Time | −0.07* | −0.01* |
| R × time vs. A × time | 0.00* | 0.09* |
| R × time vs. M × time | −0.10* | −0.01* |
| R × time vs. CR × time | −0.01 | 0.08 |
| SD_(intercept)|group | 0.04* | 0.14* |
| σ | 0.26* | 0.30* |
| M | 5.25* | 5.47* |
| M vs. A | −0.05 | 0.22 |
| M vs. R | −0.07 | 0.20 |
| M vs. CR | −0.08 | 0.22 |
| Time | −0.12* | −0.06* |
| M × time vs. A × time | 0.06* | 0.14* |
| M × time vs. R × time | 0.01* | 0.10* |
| M × time vs. CR × time | 0.05* | 0.15* |
| SD_(intercept)|group | 0.04* | 0.13* |
| σ | 0.26* | 0.30* |
| CR | 5.34* | 5.55* |
| CR vs. A | −0.13 | 0.13 |
| CR vs. R | −0.15 | 0.12 |
| CR vs. M | −0.20 | 0.06 |
| Time | −0.03 | 0.03 |
| CR × time vs. A × time | −0.03 | 0.05 |
| CR × time vs. R × time | −0.08 | 0.01 |
| CR × time vs. M × time | −0.14* | −0.05* |
| Proportion of group vigilant | ||
| SD_(intercept)|observation | 0.46* | 2.17* |
| SD_(intercept)|group | 0.00* | 1.00* |
| A | −4.88* | −1.93* |
| A vs. R | 0.30* | 3.65* |
| A vs. M | 4.06* | 8.42* |
| A vs. CR | −0.70 | 2.65 |
| SD_(intercept)|observation | 0.79* | 2.33* |
| SD_(intercept)|group | 0.00* | 0.99* |
| R | −2.46* | −0.37* |
| R vs. A | −3.54* | −0.25* |
| R vs. M | 2.40* | 5.87* |
| R vs. CR | −2.52 | 0.52 |
| SD_(intercept)|observation | 0.45* | 2.15* |
| SD_(intercept)|group | 0.00* | 1.10* |
| M | 1.53* | 4.11* |
| M vs. A | −8.47* | −3.98* |
| M vs. R | −6.13* | −2.36* |
| M vs. CR | −7.50* | −3.34* |
| SD_(intercept)|observation | 0.00* | 2.19* |
| SD_(intercept)|group | 0.00* | 1.12* |
| CR | −3.69* | −1.19* |
| CR vs. A | −2.62 | 0.68 |
| CR vs. R | −0.61 | 2.39 |
| CR vs. M | 3.26* | 7.07* |
| Latency to relax | ||
| SD_(intercept)|group | 0.00* | 0.89* |
| σ | 1.16* | 1.75* |
| A | 0.58* | 2.08* |
| A vs. R | 0.52* | 2.51* |
| A vs. M | 2.31* | 4.28* |
| A vs. CR | −0.30 | 1.69 |
| SD_(intercept)|group | 0.00* | 0.86* |
| σ | 1.17* | 1.76* |
| R | 2.10* | 3.50* |
| R vs. A | −2.48* | −0.53* |
| R vs. M | 0.79* | 2.87* |
| R vs. CR | −1.87 | 0.17 |
| SD_(intercept)|group | 0.00* | 0.85* |
| σ | 1.17* | 1.73* |
| M | 3.90* | 5.36* |
| M vs. A | −4.43* | −2.37* |
| M vs. R | −2.93* | −0.76* |
| M vs. CR | −3.60* | −1.57* |
| SD_(intercept)|group | 0.00* | 0.84* |
| σ | 1.14 | 1.71* |
| CR | 1.26* | 2.69* |
| CR vs. A | −1.62 | 0.30 |
| CR vs. R | −0.12 | 1.96 |
| CR vs. M | 1.69* | 3.69* |
The 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) of the differences were compared based on bootstrapping methods. Each treatment type was leveled separately and compared with the 95% CIs of the remaining treatments. Playback conditions: A, alert calls; CR, chuck recruitment sequence; M, mobbing sequence; R, recruitment calls.
*
95% CIs not crossing zero were categorized as a significant contrast.