. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 1.

Published in final edited form as: Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2015;75(2):144–159.

Tab. 4.

The influence of the tissue of cell origin

Dependent variable	Type III test		LSM			Difference in LSM
Dependent variable	F	p	Estimate	value	SE	estimate	value	SE	P
Viability	3.09	0.080	ADMSC	63.777	2.3655	No difference
Viability	3.09	0.080	BMMSC	57.898	2.3655	No difference
Cell size	26.4	<.0001	ADMSC	14.009	0.1991	ADMSC vs BMMSC	1.4472	0.2815	<.0001
Cell size	26.4	<.0001	BMMSC	12.562	0.1991	ADMSC vs BMMSC	1.4472	0.2815	<.0001
Doubling time	85.73	<.0001	ADMSC	12.722	0.2899	ADMSC vs BMMSC	−3.796	0.41	<.0001
Doubling time	85.73	<.0001	BMMSC	16.518	0.2899	ADMSC vs BMMSC	−3.796	0.41	<.0001
Colony formation	58.35	<.0001	ADMSC	18.5	0.7225	ADMSC vs BMMSC	7.8056	1.0218	<.0001
Colony formation	58.35	<.0001	BMMSC	10.694	0.7225	ADMSC vs BMMSC	7.8056	1.0218	<.0001
Labeling efficiency	10.8	0.0013	ADMSC	94.616	0.5582	ADMSC vs BMMSC	2.6025	0.7921	0.0013
Labeling efficiency	10.8	0.0013	BMMSC	92.013	0.562	ADMSC vs BMMSC	2.6025	0.7921	0.0013
Cell migration	14.05	0.0002	ADMSC	48.055	1.8897	ADMSC vs BMMSC	10.0185	2.6724	0.0002
Cell migration	14.05	0.0002	BMMSC	38.037	1.8897	ADMSC vs BMMSC	10.0185	2.6724	0.0002