. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 1.

Published in final edited form as: Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars). 2015;75(2):144–159.

Tab. 5.

The influence of the cell exposure to acidosis

Dependent variable	Type III test		LSM			Difference in LSM
Dependent variable	F	p	Estimate	value	SE	estimate	value	SE	P
Viability	4350.63	<.0001	Yes:	36.7778	0.5159	Yes vs No	48.1204	0.7295	<.0001
Viability	4350.63	<.0001	No:	84.8981	0.5159	Yes vs No	48.1204	0.7295	<.0001
Cell size	74.1	<.0001	Yes:	14.3926	0.1819	Yes vs No	−2.2139	0.2572	<.0001
Cell size	74.1	<.0001	No:	12.1787	0.1819	Yes vs No	−2.2139	0.2572	<.0001
Doubling time	94.31	<.0001	Yes:	16.5833	0.2859	Yes vs No	−3.9259	0.4043	<.0001
Doubling time	94.31	<.0001	No:	12.6574	0.2859	Yes vs No	−3.9259	0.4043	<.0001
Colony formation	54.91	<.0001	Yes:	10.787	0.7271	Yes vs No	7.6204	1.0283	<.0001
Colony formation	54.91	<.0001	No:	18.4074	0.7271	Yes vs No	7.6204	1.0283	<.0001
Labeling efficiency	6.7	0.0106	Yes:	92.2778	0.5697	Yes vs No	2.0784	0.8029	0.0106
Labeling efficiency	6.7	0.0106	No:	94.3562	0.5657	Yes vs No	2.0784	0.8029	0.0106
Cell migration	308.89	<.0001	Yes:	27.537	1.248	Yes vs No	31.0185	1.7649	<.0001
Cell migration	308.89	<.0001	No:	58.5556	1.248	Yes vs No	31.0185	1.7649	<.0001