Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 19.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS. 2016 Jun 19;30(10):1639–1653. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001101

Table 2.

Summary of evidence-to-policy implications for qualitative findings of ARV linkage-to-care single interventions

Intervention Relevant
papers
Potential
harms
Feasibility Equity & human
rights
considerations
Acceptability Evidence and research gaps
(1) TASK
SHIFTING:
Expansion of HIV
care services to
other health care
professionals and
CHW beyond
primary care doctors
from centralized
testing and
counseling centers
to regional and local
community centers.
Non-HIV specialist
doctors and nurses,
and lay health
workers assist
PLHIV in accessing
medical care
Ivers 2011;
Jama 2013;
Kroeger
2011;
Uebel 2013
Overall low
potential harm
  • may compromise confidentiality PLHIV as facilities and health care professionals are closer to home communities

  • may increase burden to providers

Overall feasible
within several low
and middle
income settings
  • possible in communities with proper knowledge of HIV education, presence of adequate social support and community health volunteers

  • requires proper planning and adequate training of health professionals

  • improves access to HIV linkage-to-care in LMIC settings

  • reduces wait times to seeking trained HIV medical professionals and CHW

  • increased availability of health professionals improves continuity of care for PLHIV

  • increased risk of unintended disclosure and potential reduced control of confidentiality health facilities reduce acceptability for PLHIV

  • some resistance by health care workers due to stigma of HIV because of inadequate training and sensitivity to complementary health and discrimination issues

Overall acceptable to PLHIV providers, and lay health workers
  • 4 studies in LMIC (Botswana, Haiti, South Africa) includes adults, pregnant women, and adolescents

  • more research on MSM, substance users, incarcerated individuals, and methods to reduce burden on providers and lay health workers

(2) COMMUNITY
BASED MOBILE
OUTREACH
(TESTING) and
LINKAGE: home-
based testing and
counseling and
workplace-based
voluntary testing
and counseling
intervention in
rural/mining areas,
with subsequent
linkage to
community health
centers or on-site
health services at therural worksite
Bhagwangee
2008;
Kroeger
2011;
Naik 2013
Overall low
potential harm
  • may compromise confidentiality of PLHIV and bring discrimination to family members because of unintended disclosure at proximity to testing facilities in community

  • may increase distress and conflict in household because of unintended disclosure at testing facility

Overall feasible
within several low
income settings
  • possible in rural communities and localities far from testing centers

  • requires available health care professionals for testing and counseling

  • improves access to HIV linkage-to-care in LMIC settings

  • reduces wait times to seeking trained HIV medical professionals and CHW

  • increased availability of health care professionals improves continuity of care for PLHIV

  • likely reduced control of confidentiality, increased risk of unintended disclosure at home and work place, with increased likelihood of distress and conflict within household of PLHIV reduces acceptability

Overall limited acceptability
to PLHIV, providers, and
acceptable to lay health
workers
  • 3 studies in MIC (Botswana and South Africa) includes adults men and women at work and in communities

  • more research on MSM, substance users, incarcerated individuals, pregnant women, and adolescents needed

  • inclusion of research on how to reduce confidentiality issues and methods to address fears of unintended disclosure and familial conflict for PLHIV

(3) INTEGRATED
CARE: systematic,
institutional
coordination and
integration ofspecialized HIV
care into general/
primary care
services, with goalof reducing costs,
the total number of
medical facilities to
travel to, andappointment wait
times necessary for
PLHIV seeking
medical
professionals for
primary care, HIV
linked care, and
other health related
services
Johnson
2003;
Uebel 2013
Overall
low/moderate
potential harm
  • may increase stigma or discrimination of PLHIV if administrative staff at integrated center are not adequately trained on HIV education or needs of PLHIV

Overall feasible
within high
income settings
  • possible in communities with HIV education, adequate social support and community health volunteers

  • requires health professional training and proper planning

  • requires moderate to high resources for facilities and concentration of diversely skilled medical professionals

  • improves access to HIV linkage to care and PLHIV of low socio-economic background because of better navigation of care cascade in HIC, and assist marginalized key populations in gaining greater access to a ranges of supportive services

  • may reduce incentives to seek HIV care for PLHIV who prefer more discretion in HIV treatment services, and for PLHIV who prefer to continue care with existing providers

  • health care providers may prefer current procedures and treatment methods , and may encounter administrative barriers, or face institutional differences in integration

Overall acceptable to
PLHIV, and limited
acceptability to providers
and lay health workers
  • 2 studies in MIC (South Africa) and HIC (US) included adults, youths, and transgendered individuals

  • more research on MSM, substance users, incarcerated individuals, pregnant women and adolescents

(4) PROVIDER
INITIATED
TESTING AND
COUNSELING
(PITC) and
LINKAGE: HIV
testing intervention
where health care
providers at non
HIV-specific
medical centers
initiate HIV testing
for clients who
originally scheduled
health care visit for
other services, such
as seeking care at
voluntary testing
centers, primary
care centers, and
antenatal care
centers
Ferguson
2014;
Macpherson
2013
Overall
low/moderate
potential harm
  • small scale operations may compromise confidentiality

  • increasing HIV testing in LIC rural communities while clients visit health facilities for other services

  • PLHIV may not have originally planned on getting tested and may be unprepared for HIV-positive result

Overall limited
feasibility in
several low-
income rural
contexts
  • Difficult to implement on a larger scale because most PITC are operating at voluntary testing and counseling centers

  • improves testing availability, access to HIV education, and access to HIV linkage-to-care in LMIC settings

  • reduces wait times to seeking trained HIV medical professionals

  • for individuals discovering HIV-positive result because of testing at ANC, improves maternal health and survival of infants

  • increased risk of unintended disclosure and potential reduced control of confidentiality health facilities both reduce acceptability for PLHIV

Overall limited acceptability
to PLHIV and acceptable to
providers and lay health
workers
  • 2 studies in LIC (Kenya, Malawi) included adults, adolescents, and pregnant women

  • more research on MSM, substance users, incarcerated individuals, pregnant women, and adolescents

  • research needed on reducing confidentiality issues and distress of discovering HIV-positive status when testing was for other purposes

(5) CESSATION
SUPPORT FOR
SUBSTANCE
USERS TO
PREPARE HIV
LINKAGE:
intervention of
giving PLHIV who
are substance-users
support to cease
usage, and helping
them understand the
health and social
benefits of entering
linkage to care.
Intervention was
particularly useful
for helping
marginalized
populations (Youth
and Homeless)
transition into
linkage to care
medical visits and
related services
Johnson
2003;
Nunn 2010
Overall
limited
potential harm
Overall feasible
within high
income settings
  • substance use support services tend to be part of a larger, comprehensive active referral, case management system, or integrated care facility in HIC and high resource settings

  • requires proper planning and adequate training of health professionals

  • improves readiness to accept HIV-positive status and increases motivation for seeking HIV primary care, improving linkage to care for individuals of low socio-economic background

  • improves relationships with medical professional facilitates navigation of care cascade in HIC

  • marginalized key populations gain greater knowledge of ranges of supportive services

  • PLHIV reported that successful treatment for substance use is vital to prepare them for HIV-status and motivating their desire for HIV primary care

Overall acceptable to
PLHIV, providers, and lay
health workers
  • 2 studies in US on adults and adolescents, including transgender youths and recently released prison population

  • further research in LMIC settings, and on MSM, injection drug-users, pregnant women, and adolescents