Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 14;17:467–483. doi: 10.1007/s10522-015-9626-4

Table 1.

Summarises research conducted into the effect of obesity on muscle strength in adolescence (14–17 years old)

Studies Gender Samples (years) Muscle group Measures Findings
Blimkie et al. (1990) M 11 Obese (16.5)
10 Non-obese (16.6)
Range 15–18
KE – IM KE MVC 90°, 120°, 140°, 160°
– IK KE MVC 30°/s, 60°/s, 120°/s, 180°/s
– Thigh CSA using CT scans
– MUA
– Bioelectrical impedance
– IM MVC all angles p = ns
– IK MVC all speeds p = ns
– IM/BM ↓ obese
– IM/CSA all angles p = ns
– IK/CSA all angles p = ns
– MUA ↓ obese
Maffiuletti et al. (2008) M 10 Obese (15.6)
10 Non-obese (14.9)
Range 13–17
KE – IM KE MVC 40°, 80°
– IK KE MVC 180°/s
– Bioelectrical impedance
– IM MVC 40° ↑ obese
– IM 40°/FFM p = ns
– IM MVC 80° p = ns
– IM 80°/FFM p = ns
– IK MVC ↑ obese
– IK/FFM p = ns
Abdelmoula et al. (2012) M 12 Obese (14.2)
10 Non-obese (14.4)
Range 12–15
KE – IM KE MVC 60°
– DEXA
– IM MVC ↑ obese
– IM/BM ↓ obese
– IM/FFM p > 0.05
– IM/LM thigh ↑ obese
– IM/MM thigh ↑ obese

M males, F females, KE knee extensor, IM isometric, IK isokinetic, CSA cross sectional area, MUA motor unit activation, BM body mass, LM lean mass, MM muscle mass, FFM fat free mass