Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 1;94(6):1223–1233. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0639

Table 3.

Descriptive and bivariate analyses of association between container categories (functional) and socioeconomic/infrastructural variables (N = 163), Dhaka, 2011

Socioeconomic/infrastructural variable Total pupae-positive containers (N = 163) n (%) Containers category based on functional types [n (%)]
P value
Household chores (A), N = 73 Ornamental (B) N = 20 Amenities (C) N = 22 Discarded (D) N = 37 Repairing and reconstruction (E) N = 11
Educational status (household head)
 Primary 73 (44.78) 27 (36.98) 10 (50.00) 10 (45.45) 21 (56.76) 5 (45.45) 0.575
 Secondary 57 (34.97) 26 (35.62) 6 (30.00) 9 (40.91) 11 (29.73) 5 (45.45)
 Graduate 33 (20.25) 20 (27.40) 4 (20.00) 3 (13.64) 5 (13.51) 1 (9.10)
Occupation (household head)
 Housewife/unemployed 54 (33.13) 27 (36.98) 7 (35.00) 3 (13.64) 12 (32.43) 5 (45.46) 0.47
 Business 43 (26.38) 18 (24.66) 3 (15.00) 9 (40.91) 10 (27.03) 3 (27.27)
 Service 66 (40.49) 28 (38.36) 10 (50.00) 10 (45.45) 15 (40.54) 3 (27.27)
Income (annual household) (in Taka)
 Low (< 30K) 51 (32.08) 34 (46.57) 6 (30.00) 5 (22.73) 5 (15.15) 1 (9.09) 0.0481*
 Medium (30–70K) 54 (33.96) 22 (30.14) 6 (30.00) 9 (40.91) 15 (45.45) 2 (18.18)
 High (> 70K) 54 (33.96) 17 (23.29) 8 (40.00) 8 (36.36) 13 (39.40) 8 (72.73)
Water supply (provisions to household)
 Piped water 123 (75.46) 53 (72.60) 16 (80.00) 16 (72.73) 28 (75.68) 10 (90.91) 0.79
 Tube wells and others 40 (24.54) 20 (27.40) 4 (20.00) 6 (27.27) 9 (24.32) 1 (9.09)
Waste disposal
 Municipal/private pick up 143 (87.73) 62 (84.93) 18 (90.00) 19 (86.36) 34 (91.89) 10 (90.91) 0.899
 Open disposal 20 (12.27) 11 (15.07) 2 (10.00) 3 (13.64) 3 (8.11) 1 (9.09)
Purpose of storing water in household
 Drinking and cooking 70 (42.94) 42 (57.53) 6 (30.00) 7 (31.82) 11 (29.73) 4 (36.36) 0.0187*
 Cleaning, washing, showers 93 (57.06) 31 (42.47) 14 (70.00) 15 (68.18) 26 (70.27) 7 (63.4)
*

Significant at P < 0.05 level.

Collapsed six income categories into three categories for valid statistical analysis. Gross annual household income was considered appropriate because income status of households not only depends on the number of wage earners but also on type of occupation and possession of income-generating assets. Information on income was not available (i.e., nonresponse) from four of the households surveyed.