Table 1.
Genomic DNA samples used in this study
| Taenia spp. | Developmental stage (no. of samples analyzed) | Country |
|---|---|---|
| Taenia solium (102) | Cysticercus (4) | Cameroon |
| Proglottid (75) | China | |
| Cysticercus (1) | Ecuador | |
| Cysticercus (8) | India | |
| Cysticercus (1) | Mozambique | |
| Cysticercus (5) | Nepal | |
| Cysticercus (1) | South Africa | |
| Cysticercus (1) | Tanzania | |
| Proglottid (5) | Thailand | |
| Cysticercus (1) | Vietnam | |
| Taenia saginata (102) | Proglottid (2) | Belgium |
| Proglottid (1) | Brazil | |
| Proglottid (1) | Cameroon | |
| Proglottid (73) | China | |
| Proglottid (1) | Ecuador | |
| Proglottid (15) | Indonesia | |
| Cysticercus (3)* | Indonesia | |
| Proglottid (1) | Korea | |
| Proglottid (5) | Thailand | |
| Taenia asiatica (34) | Proglottid (24) | China |
| Proglottid (1) | Indonesia | |
| Cysticercus (1)* | Indonesia | |
| Proglottid (4) | Philippines | |
| Cysticercus (1) | Taiwan | |
| Proglottid (3) | Thailand |
*
The cysticerci were prepared from nonobese diabetic/severe combined immunodeficiency mice intraperitoneally injected with in vitro hatched oncospheres.21