Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 2.
Published in final edited form as: J Reprod Fertil. 1965 Oct;10(2):227–240. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0100227

Table 3.

(a) Pyruvate–glucose interaction
Treatment Concentration
Response
Mean angular response Response (%)
Pyruvate Glucose Drop number
1 2 3 4
1 3·16 × 10−4 M 1 mg/ml 4 5 6 4 38·95 39·5
2 3·16 × 10−4 M 0 5 5 4 8 42·60 45·8
3 6·00 × 10−5 M 1 mg/ml 3 3 2 3 28·53 22·8
4 6·00 × 10−5 M 0 0 0 1 0 10·43 3·3
(b) Analysis of variance
Source of variation d.f m.s.

Between drops 3 9·122
Between treatments (3) (832·208)
 Pyruvate 1 1814·760*
 Glucose 1 208·803
 P × G 1 473·062
Error 9 36·551
Total 15
Theoretical variance 75·3

Response is the number of normal blastocysts from twelve 2-cell ova after 3 days cultivation in vitro.

Two-cell ova obtained 43 hr after HCG injection.

*

P< 0·001.

0·05 > P > 0·01.