Skip to main content
. 2016 Apr 21;94(6):433–441. doi: 10.2471/BLT.14.151670

Table 1. Adjusted overall estimated prevalence of pulmonary tuberculosis per 100 000 population aged ≥ 15 years, Gambia, 2012.

Group Prevalence per 100 000 population (95% CI)
Smear-positive cases
Bacteriologically confirmed cases
Model 1a Model 2b Model 3c Model 1a Model 2b Model 3c
Overall point estimate 80 (44–116) 92 (55–128) 90 (53–127) 181 (129–232) 199 (147–250) 212 (152–272)
Residence
Rural 79 (27–132) 90 (44–142) 86 (32–140) 154 (90–219) 165 (102–228) 109 (54–164)
Urban 81 (35–127) 93 (44–142) 96 (43–148) 219 (138–301) 239 (152–327) 266 (164–368)
Sex
Male 139 (82–195) 151 (88–213) 148 (88–208) 295 (208–381) 309 (221–396) 333 (233–433)
Female 40 (0–81) 40 (1–80) 41(0–83) 103 (50–155) 104 (53–156) 109 (54–164)
Age group (years)
15–34 45 (19–71) 53 (23–82) 56 (24–88) 109 (63–155) 117 (70–163) 133 (76–190)
35–54 102 (57–190) 141 (59–224) 144 (65–223) 285 (178–392) 323 (199–447) 355 (219–490)
≥ 55 146 (55–387) 187 (0–385) 159 (0–367) 331 (92–570) 364 (140–588) 329 (99–558)

CI: confidence interval.

a Model 1: logistic regression model with robust standard errors and no missing value imputation.

b Model 2: logistic regression model with robust standard errors and missing value imputation of non-participants as well as participants.

c Model 3: logistic regression model with robust standard errors, with missing value imputation of participants with missing smear and/or culture results, and inverse probability weighting applied to all survey participants to correct for differentials in participation by age, sex and recidence.4,8