Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 2;6:27320. doi: 10.1038/srep27320

Figure 4. Morphological comparisons of the WT and TG plants.

Figure 4

(A) fully expanded leaves of the WT and TG plants under an anatomical lens, scale bar, 1 mm; (B) stems image of the WT and TG plants under anatomical lens, scale bar, 1 mm; (C) phenotypes of three-month-old WT and TG plants initiated from the same amount of tillers; (D) inflorescence phenotype of the TG and WT plants, scale bar, 1 cm; (E) inflorescence phenotype of the TG plants, the arrows point to new buds, scale bar, 1 cm; (F) phenotype of a single tiller of the TG plants at the jointing stage under low-light condition, scale bar, 1 cm; (G) phenotype of the TG and WT plants after a salt shock treatment with 300 mM NaCl for one week, the TG plants stayed green, while the WT plant was obviously wilted.