Table II. Comparison of mediastinal and abdominal LN detection results using various CNN models. Numbers in bold indicate the best performance values on classification accuracy.
| Region | Mediastinum | Abdomen | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Method | AUC | TPR/3FP | AUC | TPR/3FP |
| [41] | - | 0.63 | - | 0.70 |
| [22] | 0.92 | 0.70 | 0.94 | 0.83 |
| [36] | - | 0.78 | - | 0.78 |
| CifarNet | 0.91 | 0.70 | 0.81 | 0.44 |
| AlexNet-ImNet | 0.89 | 0.63 | 0.80 | 0.41 |
| AlexNet-RI-H | 0.94 | 0.79 | 0.92 | 0.67 |
| AlexNet-TL-H | 0.94 | 0.81 | 0.92 | 0.69 |
| GoogLeNet-RI-H | 0.85 | 0.61 | 0.80 | 0.48 |
| GoogLeNet-TL-H | 0.94 | 0.81 | 0.92 | 0.70 |
| AlexNet-RI-L | 0.94 | 0.77 | 0.88 | 0.61 |
| GoogLeNet-RI-L | 0.95 | 0.85 | 0.91 | 0.69 |
| Combined | 0.95 | 0.85 | 0.93 | 0.70 |