Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 11;35(5):1285–1298. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2016.2528162

Table II. Comparison of mediastinal and abdominal LN detection results using various CNN models. Numbers in bold indicate the best performance values on classification accuracy.

Region Mediastinum Abdomen
Method AUC TPR/3FP AUC TPR/3FP
[41] - 0.63 - 0.70
[22] 0.92 0.70 0.94 0.83
[36] - 0.78 - 0.78
CifarNet 0.91 0.70 0.81 0.44
AlexNet-ImNet 0.89 0.63 0.80 0.41
AlexNet-RI-H 0.94 0.79 0.92 0.67
AlexNet-TL-H 0.94 0.81 0.92 0.69
GoogLeNet-RI-H 0.85 0.61 0.80 0.48
GoogLeNet-TL-H 0.94 0.81 0.92 0.70
AlexNet-RI-L 0.94 0.77 0.88 0.61
GoogLeNet-RI-L 0.95 0.85 0.91 0.69
Combined 0.95 0.85 0.93 0.70