Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 17;7(8):9007–9016. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6928

Table 1. Correlation between Cryab expression and OS clinicopthological parameters.

Result of immunostaining (No. of patients)
Parameter Cryab-negative (n = 21/36) Cryab-positive (n = 15/36) p
Age (yrs)
<19 13 8
≥19 8 7 1.000
Gender
Male 12 11
Female 9 4 0.054
Site of primary tumor
Femur 14 8
Tibia 3 3
Humerus 3 2
Pelvis 0 1
Other 1 1 0.103
Histologic differentiation ††
Osteoblastic 10 13
Chondroblastic 2 2
Fibroblastic 5 0
Telangiectatic 3 0
Other 1 0 0.049
Enneking stage
I 2 0
IIA 6 1
IIB 12 11
III 1 3 0.001a
Response to chemotherapy *
Good 15 7
Poor 4 8
NA 2 0 0.032
Metastasis
Negative 14 4
Positive 7 11 0.019

Note:

Femur vs. Tibia/ Humerus/Pelvis/Other;

††

Osteoblastic vs. Chondroblastic/ Fibroblastic/ Telangiectatic/Other;

I/IIA vs. IIB/III;

*

good vs. poor/NA;

a

Fisher's exact probability.