Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 2;7(9):9788–9800. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7125

Table 1. Relationship between MGMT expression, MGMT gene methylation, DNMT1 expression and clinicopathologic parameters in GC.

Clinicopathologic
Parameters (n = 33)
MGMT-MPS
(++/±)n
P MGMT-IHC
(++/±)n
P DNMT1-IHC
(++/±)n
P
HP (CagA)
 Positive 17/5 0.009 7/15 0.031 18/4 0.049
 Negative 3/8 8/3 5/6
Age (years)
 ≤ 59 10/5 N 7/8 N 12/3 N
 > 59 10/8 8/10 11/7
Gender
 Male 12/8 N 9/11 N 13/7 N
 Female 8/5 6/7 10/3
Bormann Type
 I–II 4/3 N 4/3 N 6/1 N
 III–IV 16/10 11/15 17/9
Location
 Middle/Proximal 7/5 N 5/7 N 8/4 N
 Distal 13/8 10/11 15/6
Diameter (cm)
 ≤ 5 11/8 N 9/10 N 13/6 N
 > 5 9/5 6/8 10/4
Histologic type
 Intestinal 8/5 N 5/8 N 9/4 N
 Diffuse 12/8 10/10 14/6
Depth of invasion
 T1, T2 6/4 N 4/6 N 8/2 N
 T3, T4 14/9 11/12 15/8
Lymph-node metastasis
 No 7/4 N 5/6 N 8/3 N
 Yes 13/9 10/12 15/7
Differentiation
 High/Middle 8/4 N 5/7 N 8/4 N
 Moderate/Low 12/9 9/12 15/6
TNM stage
 I–II 1/9 0.000 8/2 0.020 5/5 N
 III–IV 19/4 7/16 18/5

Abbreviation: N, no significant difference.

Statistical significance is assessed using the Pearson χ2 test, Fisher's exact test, or the Mann-Whitney U test. Differences are considered statistically significant in a two-tailed test for p < 0.05.