Table 1a. Features of included studies.
References | Year | Patients (n) | Mean age | Methods • | ERb assessment •• | ERb status | Median Follow up(Months) | Quality Score | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERb+ | ERb− | ||||||||
Borgquist et al.[11] | 2008 | 512 | 64.2 | i | ii | 167 | 312 | 106 | ***** |
114 # | 60 | 54 | NA | ||||||
139 ## | 71 | 68 | NA | ||||||
Chantzi et al.[20] | 2013 | 95 | 52 | i | i | b1:66 b2:65 |
b1:29 b2:30 |
NA | ****** |
Gruvberger-Saal et al.[5]$, ¶¶¶¶ |
2007 | 425 | NA | i | ii | 262 | 91 | 174 | ******* |
Guo et al. [21]¶¶¶¶¶ | 2014 | 490 | 49 | i | ii | 110 | 380 | 60 | ******* |
Honma et al. [2]§ | 2008 | 442 | 56 | i | ii | 405 | 37 | 133 | ****** |
Hopp et al.[12] | 2004 | 305 | 62 | iii | v | 141 | 164 | 65 | ***** |
186# | 89 | 97 | 74 | ||||||
119 ## | 52 | 67 | 50 | ||||||
Kim et al.[13] | 2012 | 139 | NA | ii | iii | 53 | 87 | 48 | ***** |
Mahle et al.[14]§ | 2009 | 145 | 63 | i | ii | 129 | 16 | 165 | ******* |
Mann et al.[1] | 2001 | 47 ## | NA | i | ii | 33 | 14 | 88 | **** |
118# | NA | ii | 78 | 40 | 49 | ||||
Markey et al.[28] | 2009 | 121 | 54 | ii | iii | 50 | 71 | 38 | *** |
Myers et al.[15] | 2004 | 150 | NA | i | i | 87 | 63 | 27 | *** |
Nakopoulou et al.[3] | 2004 | 181 | 61 | i | ii | 128 | 50 | 76 | ***** |
Novelli et al.[6] | 2008 | 936 | NA | i | ii | 520 | 416 | 50 | ******* |
Omoto et al.[18] | 2002 | 57 | 60.9 | i | ii | 15 | 42 | 48 | *** |
Omoto et al.[17] | 2001 | 88 | 54 & | i | i | 52 | 36 | NA | **** |
O'Neill et al. ¶[16] | 2004 | 167 | NA | i | ii | 117 | 10 | NA | ****** |
NA | ii | iii | 86 | 35 | |||||
Palmieri et al.[19] | 2004 | 82 | 59 | i | i | 33 | 46 | 96 ¶¶ | **** |
Qui et al.[22] | 2009 | 308 | 58 | i | ii | 123 | 185 | 48 | *** |
Shaaban et al.[23] | 2008 | 880 | NA | i | i, ii | 558 | 112 | 94 | ****** |
Sugiura et al.[24] | 2007 | 150 | 53 | i | i | 103 | 47 | 58 | *** |
ii | iii | 52 | 98 | ||||||
Vinayagam et al. [4]¶,§ | 2007 | 141 | 68 | i | i | 100 | 41 | BCS:71; BCR:79 |
***** |
100 | ii | iii | 34 | 30 | |||||
Wen et al.[25] | 2002 | 116 | 53.7 | iii | v | 40 | 76 | 35.3 | ****** |
Wimberly et al.[26] | 2014 | Yale-1:649 | NA | iv | iv | b1:228 b5:209 |
b1:228 b5:209 |
95 | ***** |
Yale-2:398 | b1:147 b5:153 |
b1:148 b5:152 |
123 | **** | |||||
Toronto: 976 | b1:225 b5:153 |
b1:225 b5:153 |
98.2 | **** | |||||
NCI-PBCS: 1375 | b5:467 | b5:468 | 116 | **** | |||||
Yan et al.¶¶¶,§[27] | 2011 | 147 | NA | i | ii | 90 | 20 | 64 | *** |
Zhang et al.[29] | 2014 | 279 | 48.8 | i | ii | 40 | 109 | 92 | *** |
i.IHC; ii, PCR; iii, Immunoblot; iv. TMA
i, Allred score; ii, Proportion of positive cells; iii, Ct value; iv, AQUA score; v, Band intensities
Tamoxifen/endocrine-treated subgroup
untreated subgroup; & Median
Postmenopausal patients.
Estimated based on the description in the text.
Familial breast cancer patients.
Stage II patients.
This group was reported in three publications involving the same study population. We selected the study with the longest follow-up period for analysis.
NA, Not available; ER, estrogen receptor;