Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 6;7(9):10373–10385. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7219

Table 1a. Features of included studies.

References Year Patients (n) Mean age Methods ERb assessment •• ERb status Median Follow up(Months) Quality Score
ERb+ ERb−
Borgquist et al.[11] 2008 512 64.2 i ii 167 312 106 *****
114 # 60 54 NA
139 ## 71 68 NA
Chantzi et al.[20] 2013 95 52 i i b1:66
b2:65
b1:29
b2:30
NA ******
Gruvberger-Saal
et al.[5]$, ¶¶¶¶
2007 425 NA i ii 262 91 174 *******
Guo et al. [21]¶¶¶¶¶ 2014 490 49 i ii 110 380 60 *******
Honma et al. [2 2008 442 56 i ii 405 37 133 ******
Hopp et al.[12] 2004 305 62 iii v 141 164 65 *****
186# 89 97 74
119 ## 52 67 50
Kim et al.[13] 2012 139 NA ii iii 53 87 48 *****
Mahle et al.[14 2009 145 63 i ii 129 16 165 *******
Mann et al.[1] 2001 47 ## NA i ii 33 14 88 ****
118# NA ii 78 40 49
Markey et al.[28] 2009 121 54 ii iii 50 71 38 ***
Myers et al.[15] 2004 150 NA i i 87 63 27 ***
Nakopoulou et al.[3] 2004 181 61 i ii 128 50 76 *****
Novelli et al.[6] 2008 936 NA i ii 520 416 50 *******
Omoto et al.[18] 2002 57 60.9 i ii 15 42 48 ***
Omoto et al.[17] 2001 88 54 & i i 52 36 NA ****
O'Neill et al. [16] 2004 167 NA i ii 117 10 NA ******
NA ii iii 86 35
Palmieri et al.[19] 2004 82 59 i i 33 46 96 ¶¶ ****
Qui et al.[22] 2009 308 58 i ii 123 185 48 ***
Shaaban et al.[23] 2008 880 NA i i, ii 558 112 94 ******
Sugiura et al.[24] 2007 150 53 i i 103 47 58 ***
ii iii 52 98
Vinayagam et al. [4] 2007 141 68 i i 100 41 BCS:71;
BCR:79
*****
100 ii iii 34 30
Wen et al.[25] 2002 116 53.7 iii v 40 76 35.3 ******
Wimberly et al.[26] 2014 Yale-1:649 NA iv iv b1:228
b5:209
b1:228
b5:209
95 *****
Yale-2:398 b1:147
b5:153
b1:148
b5:152
123 ****
Toronto: 976 b1:225
b5:153
b1:225
b5:153
98.2 ****
NCI-PBCS: 1375 b5:467 b5:468 116 ****
Yan et al.¶¶¶,§[27] 2011 147 NA i ii 90 20 64 ***
Zhang et al.[29] 2014 279 48.8 i ii 40 109 92 ***

i.IHC; ii, PCR; iii, Immunoblot; iv. TMA

••

i, Allred score; ii, Proportion of positive cells; iii, Ct value; iv, AQUA score; v, Band intensities

#

Tamoxifen/endocrine-treated subgroup

##

untreated subgroup; & Median

Postmenopausal patients.

¶¶

Estimated based on the description in the text.

¶¶¶

Familial breast cancer patients.

¶¶¶¶

Stage II patients.

¶¶¶¶¶

This group was reported in three publications involving the same study population. We selected the study with the longest follow-up period for analysis.

NA, Not available; ER, estrogen receptor;