Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 5;35(14):2467–2478. doi: 10.1002/sim.6844

Table 3.

Nissen–Wolski (2007) analysis and re‐analyses.

Method Outcome Point est. LCL UCL Two‐sided p‐value
Peto OR 1.43 1.03 1.98 0.032
DL OR 1.29 0.94 1.76 0.12
DL RR 1.28 0.94 1.75 0.12
SGS (1) RR 1.41 1.14 1.75 0.0026
SGS (2) RR 1.41 1.13 1.76 0.0031

(1) includes all 48 studies; (2) excludes 10 studies with no event on both arms.

DL, DerSimonian and Laird; SGS, Shuster, Guo and Skylar; RR, relative risk; OR, odds ratio; LCL(UCL)=lower (upper) 95% confidence limit.