Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 3.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015 Dec 25;35(6):1408–1419. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2015.2512711

TABLE II.

Summary of quantitative evaluation of the various methods for the infarct core and border zone segmentation using the DSC. Significant differences between the DSC of CMF and those of other methods are indicated by asterisks.

Method Infarct Core
DSC (%)
Border Zone
DSC (%)
CMF 87.98±7.65 65.31±8.46
CMF3D *85.92±10.51 *61.34±14.12
FWHM 88.13±8.54 *46.22±8.05
STRM1 87.60±8.61 *58.03±10.44
STRM2 *86.17±9.71 *58.64±12.8
STRM3 *83.99±11.95 *56.51±14.69
RG *53.15±14.94 *14.96±13.68