Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 3.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015 Dec 25;35(6):1408–1419. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2015.2512711

TABLE IV.

Summary of quantitative evaluation of accuracies of the CMF and STRM2 infarct segmentation methods, based on outcomes of sinus rhythm simulations.

Method RMSE (mV) MAD (%) CORR ATD (ms)
CMF 0.031±0.027 14.3±7.3 0.95±0.06 3.95±2.35
STRM2 0.043±0.029 23.6±14.7 0.90±0.08 6.14±2.9