Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Bone Miner Res. 2016 May 17;31(6):1275–1286. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2790

Table 2.

Cortical bone morphometric parameters of the femur and tibia Kruskal-Wallis (mean±SD, n=4).

Sample Site Cross-sectional
Tissue Area
T.Ar
mm2
Cross-sectional
Bone Area
B.Ar
mm2
Relative
Bone Area
B.Ar/T.Ar
%
Cross-sectional
Thickness
Cs.Th
mm
Tissue Mineral
Density
TMD
g/cm3
WT Femur 1.50
±0.19
0.65
±0.18
42.95
±6.74
0.16
±0.03
0.89
±0.03
Phospho1−/− Femur a1.82
±0.13
0.73
±0.08
40.19
±3.99
0.15
±0.02
0.87
±0.05
Pit1col2/col2 Femur 1.67
±0.07
0.65
±0.07
38.97
±2.89
0.14
±0.01
0.90
±0.01
[Phospho1−/−;
Pit1col2/col2]
Femur b1.53
±0.17
0.48
±0.11
a,b,c30.84
±4.57
a,b,c0.11
±0.02
a,c0.85
±0.02
K-W
p-values
Femur 0.041 0.079 0.029 0.027 0.049
WT Tibia 1.50
±0.26
0.64
±0.21
42.04
±7.72
0.16
±0.03
1.01
±0.06
Phospho1−/− Tibia 1.61
±0.17
0.67
±0.09
41.60
±3.37
0.15
±0.02
a0.92
±0.03
Pit1col2/col2 Tibia 1.70
±0.11
0.61
±0.07
35.82
±1.82
0.13
±0.01
0.93
±0.01
[Phospho1−/−;
Pit1col2/col2]
Tibia 1.45
±0.22
0.51
±0.12
34.67
±3.61
0.12
±0.01
a,c0.87
±0.03
K-W
p-values
Tibia 0.434 0.270 0.117 0.106 0.020

Differences at p<0.05 are indicated by

a

vs WT,

b

vs Phospho1−/−,

c

vs Pit1col2/col2