Skip to main content
. 2016 May 4;101(6):2450–2459. doi: 10.1210/jc.2016-1219

Table 3.

Comparison of Rrepeated and RMZ Among the 3 Genomic Regions by CpG Content

Bins Open Sea Islands Shores
Total sample 11 159 032 [0.9683] 36 957 [0.0032] 328 156 [0.0285]
n bins, study sample 683 823 (0.9458)a 1218 (0.0017)a 37 988 (0.0525)a
Rrepeated RMZ Rrepeated RMZ Rrepeated RMZ
Average 0.1666 0.2059 0.1857 0.2478 0.1630 0.2524
Variance 0.0044 0.0175 0.0068 0.0135 0.0036 0.0141
Comparison
Open Sea vs Islands
Shores vs Islands
Open Sea vs Shores
Rrepeated RMZ Rrepeated RMZ Rrepeated RMZ
t testb 8.06 12.56 9.50 1.35# 11.32 73.88
P value 7.6E-16 3.5E-36 2.2E-21 1.8E-01 1.1E-29 <1.0E-300

Rrepeated, longitudinal correlations between the repeated methylation measurements per bin. RMZ and RDZ are intrapair correlations methylation levels per bin between the MZ and DZ twins.

a

Pairwise comparison of the specific proportions of bins at each of the genomic regions by Z-test, or implementing χ2 test to compare the distributions of bins between the sets in all cases gave statistically highly significant results, P < .001 (eg, χ2 = 14 042, df = 2, P < 106).

b

P values associated with t tests were all (but 1, marked by #) statistically significant at P < .001.