Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 3.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Radiol. 2015 Sep 12;84(12):2564–2570. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.09.003

Table 2.

Comparison of change in medial JSW and ME between OA and non-OA study participants.

OA (median, 95% CI) Non OA (median, 95% CI) p Value
Change in Medial JSW
Obs 1 0.4 (0.1–0.7) mm 0.2 (0.1–0.3) mm p = 0.015
Obs 2 0.5 (0.2–0.8) mm 0.4 (0.3–0.5) mm p = 0.020
Obs 3 0.6 (0.4–0.8) mm 0.3 (0.2–0.5) mm p = 0.001
Average 0.5 mm 0.3 mm p = 0.008
Change in ME
Obs 1 1.0 (0.1–1.1) mm 0.5 (0.2–0.8) mm p = 0.005
Obs 2 1.3 (0.9–1.7) mm 0.6 (0.2–1.0) mm p = 0.010
Obs 3 1.1 (0.6–1.6) mm 0.6 (0.4–0.8) mm p = 0.020
Average 1.1 mm 0.6 mm p = 0.001

JSW = joint space width; Obs = observer.

As in Table 1, a Bonferroni correction factor of 2 is considered in relation to the two outcome measure, implying statistical significance in the measured difference for p < 0.025.