Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 6;7:753. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00753

Table 3.

ANOVAs for effects of heterogeneity (homogeneous vs. parallel large patch vs. reciprocal large patch vs. parallel small patch vs. reciprocal small patch), intraspecific competition (without vs. with competition) and patch type (high vs. low water patches) on the growth of I. japonica at the patch level.

Effect df Biomass Number of ramets Rhizome length
Heterogeneity (H) 4, 80 5.401∗∗∗ 1.812 6.716∗∗∗
Competition (C) 1, 80 0.001 1.900 0.011
Patch type (Pt) 1, 80 175.642∗∗∗ 1.658 0.445
H × C 4, 80 6.936∗∗∗ 0.182 1.683
H ×Pt 4, 80 45.715∗∗∗ 2.557 13.536∗∗∗
C ×Pt 1, 80 63.164∗∗∗ 2.452 1.467
H × C ×Pt 4, 80 10.875∗∗∗ 1.559 4.990∗∗

Significance levels: ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗P < 0.01, P < 0.05. Patch type was treated as a repeated variable.