Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pattern Recognit. 2016 Feb;50:155–177. doi: 10.1016/j.patcog.2015.08.009

Fig. 13.

Fig. 13

Performance curves of TII-KT-CM with respect to parameters γ, β, and η on XTI,XTIV, ORL, and Cleveland. (a) TII-KT-CM on XTI, β and η are fixed, and γ varies; (b) TII-KT-CM on XTI, γ and η are fixed, and β varie; (c) TII-KT-CM on XTI, and β are fixed, and η varies; (d) TII-KT-CM on XTIV, β and η are fixed, and γ vari; (e) TII-KT-CM on XTIV, γ and η are fixed, and β varies; (f) TII-KT-CM on XTIV, γ and β are fixed, and η varies; (g) TII-KT-CM on ORL, β and η are fixed, and γ varies; (h) TII-KT-CM on ORL, γ and η are fixed, and β varie; (i) TII-KT-CM on ORL, γ and β are fixed, and η varie; (j) TII-KT-CM on cleveland, β and η are fixed, and γ varies; (k) TII-KT-CM on cleveland, γ and η are fixed, and β varies; (l) TII-KT-CM on cleveland, γ and β are fixed, and η varies.