Skip to main content
. 2016 May;13(118):20160133. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2016.0133

Table 1.

Comparison of spectroscopic features of different semiquinones reported for the Qo site. n.s., data not shown in the paper or experiment not performed; n.a., not applicable; SQo, semiquinone in the Qo site; SQi, semiquinone in the Qi site; SQres, stigmatellin-insensitive radical signal.

properties of the signal/signals SQo reported by
de Vries et al. [31] Zhang et al. [33] Cape et al. [34] Vennam et al. [35] Sarewicz et al. [36]
SQo uncoupled SQo–FeS spin-coupled
transience of signal n.s. yes n.s. n.s. yes yes
sensitivity to specific Qo-site inhibitors: stigmatellin n.s. yes yes yes yes yes
myxothiazol n.s. no n.s. n.s. yes yes
strobilurins n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s. yes yes
presence of stigmatellin-insensitive residual signal n.a. n.a. yes yes no no
g-factor of central line 2.005 2.0040 2.0054 2.0044a 2.005  1.94
linewidth of X-band spectrum of SQo [G] 8.3 11.7 11.9 11.6 14.2 n.a.
microwave power saturation saturable; slower relaxation than SQi saturable at 130 K; similar to SQi saturable at 77 K; similar to SQres n.s. non-saturable at 200 K n.s.
temperature-dependence of the EPR spectrum amplitude n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s. anti-Curie behaviour n.s.
spin–spin exchange interactions no no no no no yes
dipole–dipole interactions with: reduced FeS no no no no possibly yes n.a.
oxidized haem bL, c1 no no no yes yes yesb
interaction with magnetic nuclei  hydrogen n.s. n.s. deprotonated deprotonated n.s. n.s.
 nitrogen n.s. n.s. no no n.s. n.s.

aReported for yeast cytochrome bc1.

bInteraction between SQo–FeS coupled centre and oxidized haem bL is inferred from pulse EPR measurements [37].