Table 1.
properties of the signal/signals | SQo reported by |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
de Vries et al. [31] | Zhang et al. [33] | Cape et al. [34] | Vennam et al. [35] | Sarewicz et al. [36] |
|||
SQo uncoupled | SQo–FeS spin-coupled | ||||||
transience of signal | n.s. | yes | n.s. | n.s. | yes | yes | |
sensitivity to specific Qo-site inhibitors: | stigmatellin | n.s. | yes | yes | yes | yes | yes |
myxothiazol | n.s. | no | n.s. | n.s. | yes | yes | |
strobilurins | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | yes | yes | |
presence of stigmatellin-insensitive residual signal | n.a. | n.a. | yes | yes | no | no | |
g-factor of central line | 2.005 | 2.0040 | 2.0054 | 2.0044a | 2.005 | 1.94 | |
linewidth of X-band spectrum of SQo [G] | 8.3 | 11.7 | 11.9 | 11.6 | 14.2 | n.a. | |
microwave power saturation | saturable; slower relaxation than SQi | saturable at 130 K; similar to SQi | saturable at 77 K; similar to SQres | n.s. | non-saturable at 200 K | n.s. | |
temperature-dependence of the EPR spectrum amplitude | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | n.s. | anti-Curie behaviour | n.s. | |
spin–spin exchange interactions | no | no | no | no | no | yes | |
dipole–dipole interactions with: | reduced FeS | no | no | no | no | possibly yes | n.a. |
oxidized haem bL, c1 | no | no | no | yes | yes | yesb | |
interaction with magnetic nuclei | hydrogen | n.s. | n.s. | deprotonated | deprotonated | n.s. | n.s. |
nitrogen | n.s. | n.s. | no | no | n.s. | n.s. |
aReported for yeast cytochrome bc1.
bInteraction between SQo–FeS coupled centre and oxidized haem bL is inferred from pulse EPR measurements [37].