Table 4.
Prediction of number of negative and positive alcohol consequences (Models 2 and 3)
| Model 2: Predicting Negative Consequences | Model 3: Predicting Positive consequences | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Predictors | B (SE) | t | p | B (SE) | t | p |
| Intercept of consequences | 1.34 (0.13) | 10.43 | .000 | 6.24 (0.56) | 11.09 | .000 |
| Biweekly-level (L1) predictors of consequences | ||||||
| Prior assessment negative evaluationa | −0.001 (0.02) | −0.11 | .910 | 0.06 (0.05) | 1.32 | .188 |
| Negative evaluations x Class year | 0.06 (0.03) | 1.85 | .064 | −0.01 (0.11) | −0.14 | .892 |
| Prior assessment positive evaluationa | −0.02 (0.02) | −0.85 | .396 | 0.01 (0.08) | 0.18 | .858 |
| Positive evaluations x Class year | 0.05 (0.05) | 1.00 | .316 | −0.03 (0.16) | −0.22 | .828 |
| Prior assessment number of negative consequencesa | −0.01 (0.01) | −1.00 | .320 | 0.04 (0.03) | 1.41 | .160 |
| Prior assessment number of positive consequencesa | 0.03 (0.01) | 4.29 | .000 | 0.15 (0.02) | 6.38 | .000 |
| Concurrent assessment number of drinksa | 0.04 (0.00) | 17.62 | .000 | 0.12 (0.01) | 16.34 | .000 |
| Week of semester | −0.01(0.01) | −1.61 | .108 | −0.14 (0.02) | −7.41 | .000 |
| School year week (vs. break) | −0.09 (0.07) | −1.22 | .223 | 0.08 (0.22) | 0.36 | .721 |
| Class year | −0.11 (0.03) | −4.43 | .000 | −0.69 (0.09) | −7.51 | .000 |
| Person-level (L2) predictors of consequences(intercept effects) | ||||||
| Gender | 0.06 (0.04) | 1.52 | .129 | 0.21 (0.19) | 1.12 | .265 |
| Race/Ethnicity | −0.08 (0.05) | −1.58 | .114 | 0.14 (0.21) | 0.67 | .505 |
| School | −0.17 (0.03) | −5.74 | .000 | −0.36 (0.15) | −2.43 | .015 |
| Cohort | −0.03 (0.03) | −1.19 | .235 | −0.36 (0.12) | −2.93 | .004 |
| Average negative evaluation across weeks | 0.05 (0.04) | 1.29 | .197 | −0.07 (0.18) | −0.36 | .720 |
| Average positive evaluation across weeks | −0.11 (0.05) | −2.32 | .021 | 0.17 (0.22) | 0.76 | .434 |
| Person-level (L2) moderators of evaluation effects(slope effects) | ||||||
| Gender x (L1) negative evaluations | 0.01 (0.04) | 0.44 | .660 | 0.27(0.10) | 2.85 | .005 |
| Gender x (L1) positive evaluations | 0.02 (0.05) | 0.33 | .744 | 0.20 (0.15) | 1.30 | .193 |
Note. Alcohol use was the sum of past week number of drinks. Gender (0.4 = female, −0.6 = male); Race/Ethnicity (0 = Non-White, 1 = Non-Hispanic White); three School sites coded 1–3; three Cohorts coded 1–3; School Year Week (0 = Break Week, 1 = School Year Week); Class Year (−0.5 = First-Year, 0.5 = Sophomore); removal of cross-level interaction effects of gender (L2) on evaluations (L1) did not alter the pattern or significance of model findings
a
Person-centered variable that reflects deviations from the individual’s average score on that variable across weeks.
Bold values are significant at p < .05.