Table 4. Performance based tests of function.
Study | Measure | EXERCISE | CONTROL | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline | Outcome | Baseline | Outcome | % change | ES (SD) | |||
Sit to Stand Function | ||||||||
Single Chair stand | ||||||||
Ciro et al. 2013 (n = 1) | COPM performance (/10) | 1 | 5 | 400 | ||||
COPM satisfaction (/10) | 1 | 6 | 500 | |||||
GAS (-2 to +2) | 0 | |||||||
Mutiple Chair stand | ||||||||
Dawley 2014 (n = 1) | 30s sit-to-stand (n. stands) | 4 | 8 | 100 | ||||
Telenius et al. 2015 (n = 4) A | 30s sit-to-stand (n. stands) | (#1) 6 | (#1) 8 | (#3) 7 | (#3) 8 | N/A | N/A | |
(#2) 5 | (#2) 8 | (#4) 4 | (#4) 4 | N/A | N/A | |||
Gait speed | ||||||||
Habitual gait speed | ||||||||
Rochester et al 2009 (n = 9) | 8m walk (m/s) B | 0.72 D (0.15) | 0.88 D(0.17) | 22.2 | ||||
Tabak et al 2013 (n = 1) | 10m walk test (m/s) | 0.96 | 0.92 | -4.2 | ||||
Dawley 2014 (n = 1) | 7.6m walk (m/s) C | 0.8 | 1.43 | 78.8 | ||||
Telenius et al. 2015 (n = 4) A | 6m walk test (m/s) | (#1) 0.35 | (#1) 0.3 | (#3) 0.59 | (#3) 0.49 | N/A | N/A | |
(#2) 0.41 | (#2) 0.71 | (#4) 0.36 | (#4) 0.34 | N/A | N/A | |||
Maximal gait speed | ||||||||
Telenius et al. 2015 (n = 4) A | 6m walk test (m/s) | (#1) 0.49 | (#1) 0.5 | (#3) 0.93 | (#3) 1.11 | N/A | N/A | |
(#2) 1.1 | (#2) 1.54 | (#4) 0.71 | (#4) 0.57 | N/A | N/A | |||
Dual-talk gait speed | ||||||||
Rochester et al 2009 (n = 9) | 8m walk w. tray (m/s)B | 0.65 D (0.17) | 0.74 D (0.21) | 13.8 | ||||
Walking Endurance | ||||||||
Single task Walk distance | ||||||||
Tabak et al 2013 (n = 1) | 2-minute walk (m) | 100.6 | 129.5 | 28.7 | ||||
Dawley 2014 (n = 1) | 6-minute walk (m) | 480.36 | 562.05 | 17.0 | ||||
Dual task walk distance | ||||||||
Tabak et al 2013 (n = 1) | 2-minute walk w. subtraction task (m) | 60.7 | 102.7 | 69.2 | ||||
Balance Function | ||||||||
Scale measures | ||||||||
Tabak et al 2013 (n = 1) | Functional gait assessment (/30) | 13 | 23 | |||||
Dawley 2014 (n = 1) | MiniBESTest (/28) | 21 | 25 | |||||
Telenius et al. 2015 (n = 4) A | Berg balance scale (/56) | (#1) 23 | (#1) -27 | (#3) 42 | (#3)—41 | N/A | N/A | |
(#4) 29 | (#4)—30 | N/A | N/A | |||||
Timed Measures | ||||||||
Dawley 2014 (n = 1) | Timed up & go (s) | 15.45 | 9.05 | -41.4 | ||||
Functional Status | ||||||||
Activities of daily living (ADL's) | ||||||||
Dawley 2014 (n = 1) | G-Code: mobility AR (% Impaired) | 67 | 40 | |||||
Instrumented ADL | ||||||||
Tabak et al. 2013 (n = 1) | PDQ-39 SR (/156) | 83 | 70 | -15.7 | ||||
UPDRS-II AR (/52) | 15 | 6 | - 60.0 | |||||
Telenius et al. 2015 (n = 4) A | Barthel index AR | (#1) 11 | (#1) NR | (#3) 11 | (#3) 14 | N/A | N/A | |
(#2) 13 | (#2) 12 | (#4) 12 | (#4) 13 | N/A | N/A |
A Participant data presented individually (Participant #1–4),
B Unit changed from cm/s to m/s,
C Unit changed from mph to m/s and distance from feet to meters,
D Results rounded to nearest 2 decimal places,
AR -Assessor rated,
SR-Subject completed.
COPM—Canadian occupational performance measure. 10-point scale where a higher value indicates better performance/satisfaction, GAS—Goal Attainment scale is scored from -2, -1 (sub-optimal result), 0 (achieved goal), 1, 2 (achieved more than goal), MiniBESTest—Mini Balance evaluation systems test is scored out of 28, with higher scores indicating better function, UPDRS-II—Unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale subscale II (ADL)—is rated out of 52 with lower scores indicating less impairment, PDQ-39 —Parkinson’s disease Questionnaire -39 is rated out of 156 where a lower score indicates less impairment. Barthel Index—a rating scale out of 20, where a higher score indicates more functionality in Instrumented ADL, G—Code—a scale for reporting disability where a higher level of disability is reflected in a higher % range, Functional Gait Assessment—A scale out of 30, where a lower score indicates less function, Berg Balance scale—A scale out of 56 where a higher score indicates more function.