Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 3.
Published in final edited form as: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2016 Mar;42(3):122–138. doi: 10.1016/s1553-7250(16)42015-5

Table 1.

Synopsis of Screening and Response Protocols, Sepsis Early Recognition and Response Initiative (SERRI)

Screening for Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) (First Response)
First responder personnel Bedside nurses (acute care hospitals); bedside nurses or patient care assistants (postacute care sites)
Timing Every 12 hours from the time of admission; clock-time for screening decided on by unit nurses
Elements Heart rate, temperature, respiratory rate, latest white blood cell (WBC) count, presence of altered mental
status. Deviations from normal range are awarded points and a total score is computed; for acute care
hospitals only, a total score of ≥ 4 is interpreted as positive for SIRS and initiates contact of the second
responder.*
Evidence or guidelines
for elements
Elements derived from clinical syndrome described as SIRS; modified in prior testing at the SERRI convener
facility; approach to scoring based on that used in the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation
(APACHE) severity of illness rating system1
Actions None if score < 4; if score ≥ 4, second responder is contacted immediately.
Other Screening tool is integrated into the electronic health record of most SERRI partners; a few partners use a
Web-based or paper format.
Responding to a Patient with a Positive Screen (Second Response)
Second responder personnel Nurse practitioners (some acute care hospitals); charge nurses or rapid response teams
Timing Within one hour of detection of positive screen
Elements Physical examination and search for source of infection; laboratory work, including cultures and sensitivities;
fluid resuscitation; antibiotics; nursing interventions
Evidence or guidelines
for elements
Based on the 2008 and subsequent recommendations for goal-directed therapies from the Surviving Sepsis
Campaign; 20082 and 20123 International Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock;
and recommendations of an expert panel of acute care surgeons at the SERRI convener facility (Houston
Methodist Hospital)
Actions Decision about need for transfer to ICU; notification of attending physician; evaluation for possible infection;
early goal-directed interventions (collection of blood and fluids for culture before start of antibiotics; stat fluid
resuscitation; administer antibiotics within 1 hour); reassessment after interventions
Other Nurse practitioners (NPs) in Texas can be credentialed as independent practitioners; at the convener facility
and some other SERRI acute care sites, the NPs, using second response/sepsis evaluation and treatment
protocols approved by the hospital medical staff, can institute these protocols without waiting for the approval
of the attending physician.
*

For the skilled nursing facility/long term acute care hospitals, the positive screen threshold was lowered to ≥ 3 shortly after the initiative’s introduction because most patients in those sites would not have had a WBC count measured in the previous 24 hours.

References

1

Knaus WA, et al. APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13:818–829.

2

RP, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med. 2008;36: 296–327. Erratum in Crit Care Med. 2008;36:1394–1396.

3

Dellinger RP, et al.; Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including The Pediatric Subgroup. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med. 2013;39:165–228.