. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Comp Neurol. 2016 Jan 26;524(11):2300–2321. doi: 10.1002/cne.23952

Table 2.

Relationship among sSC neuronal markers in layer 1.

Gene (X)	% (Rorβ⁺ ∩ X⁺) / Rorβ⁺	% (Rorβ⁺ ∩ X⁺) / X⁺	% (Ntng2⁺ ∩ X⁺) / Ntng2⁺	% (Ntng2⁺ ∩ X⁺) / X⁺
Rorβ	83.6 ± 5.3	81.1 ± 3.0	78.6 ± 4.6*	50.3 ± 8.1^#
Ntng2	51.5 ± 6.4^#	81.8 ± 4.3*	82.5 ± 3.4	89.3 ± 1.9
Cdh7	53.3 ± 3.5	70.1 ± 5.4	45.8 ± 3.7	43.5 ± 3.9
Cntn3	64.4 ± 3.0	75.8 ± 4.0	58.9 ± 9.7	50.3 ± 5.5
Cdh6	7.9 ± 2.3	14.3 ± 3.4	9.6 ± 2.1	18.0 ± 3.6
Pcdh20	1.4 ± 1.4	2.3 ± 2.1	2.3 ± 1.3	2.5 ± 1.6
SP	2.2 ± 1.9	3.4 ± 3.1	4.9 ± 2.5	7.8 ± 4.3

Summary of results from double In situ hybridization using either Rorβ (2^nd and 3^rd columns) or Ntng2 (4^th and 5^th columns) as the second probe. The number in each case indicates the average overlap (∩) between the second probe and each first probe (X) or vice versa. Data (mean ± SD) were averaged across 7–12 sections from at least 3 independent experiments. Symbols (*, #) indicate cases where two different second probes produced similar degrees of overlapping expression between Rorβ and Ntng2, suggesting that our double In situ hybridization results are highly reproducible.