Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Health Care Manage Rev. 2016 Jul-Sep;41(3):178–188. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000070

Table 5.

Odds ratios indicating effect of Kaiser (n= 25) and Magnet (n = 56) hospital status on nurse and patient outcomes compared to other hospitals (n=483)

Kaiser
(n = 25)
Magnet
(n = 56)
Significance of difference
between Kaiser and Magnet


OR (95% CI) P value
Nurse Outcomes
  Job dissatisfaction 0.78* (0.60–0.99) 0.81** (0.70–0.92) 0.171
  Burnout 0.98 (0.83–1.16) 0.85** (0.77–0.94) 0.807
  Intent to leave 0.49*** (0.35–0.68) 0.82** (0.72–0.93) 0.005

Patient Outcomes
  Mortality 0.81* (0.68–0.97) 0.79*** (0.71–0.89) 0.829
  Failure to rescue 0.81* (0.68–0.97) 0.81*** (0.72–0.90) 0.958
*

p <0.05;

**

p<0.01;

***

p<0.001.

Odds ratios come from logistic regression models estimated for each outcome individually. Each model includes a variable indicating whether the nurse, in the case of nurse outcomes, or patient in the case of patient outcomes, is in a Kaiser hospital, a Magnet hospital, or a hospital that is neither Kaiser nor Magnet. All results shown are from models that controlled for hospital characteristics and in the case of nurse outcomes models, included nurse characteristics, and for patient outcomes models, accounted for patient characteristics.