Table 2. Funding by Source and Distribution of Expenditure on Core and Advanced Registry Activities by Fiscal Year, National Program of Cancer Registries.
| NPCR Registries (n =40)a,b | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
||||
| 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | Average | |
| Funding amount ($) | ||||
| Total funding received | 1 147 004 | 1 149 302 | 1 167 118 | 1 154 475 |
| Share of funding (%) | ||||
| NPCR | 59.56% | 60.34% | 62.23% | 60.71% |
| Other federal funds | 1.17% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.78% |
| Nonfederal funds | 39.27% | 38.96% | 37.29% | 38.51% |
| Registry activities (%) | ||||
| Core | 93.41% | 92.57% | 93.07% | 93.01% |
| Advanced | 6.59% | 7.43% | 6.93% | 6.99% |
| Cost per case ($) | ||||
| Core | $54.19 | $57.08 | $58.30 | $56.52 |
| Advanced | $3.82 | $4.58 | $4.34 | $4.25 |
| All activities (total) | $58.01 | $61.66 | $62.64 | $60.77 |
Abbreviation:NPCR, National Program of Cancer Registries.
a
Excludes the Pacific Regional Central Cancer Registry. Registry did not report cases diagnosed in 2006 and is still ramping up case reporting. Low case volume distorts cost per case calculations.
b
Excludes NPCR registries that also receive Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results funding: California (San Francisco-Oakland, San Jose-Monterey, Los Angeles), Georgia (Atlanta), Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan (Detroit), New Jersey, and Washington (Seattle-Puget Sound).