Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 26;11:316–321. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2016.02.016

Table 3.

The percentage distribution of patients with the pseudoprogression and glioblastoma recurrence as the function of calculated cut-offs.

Pseudoprogression (n = 19) Recurrence (n = 59) p
tCho/tNAA < 1.3 18 (94.7%) 0 < 0.001
≥ 1.3 1 (5.3%) 59 (100.0%)
Median (min; max) 0.74 (0.33–1.77) 2.13 (1.35–9.60) < 0.001
tCho/tCr < 0.7 11 (57.9%) 15 (25.4%) 0.013
≥ 0.7 8 (42.1%) 44 (74.6%)
Median (min; max) 0.64 (0.28–1.37) 0.89 (0.44–2.83) 0.013
tNAA/tCr > 0.7 18 (94.7%) 4 (6.8%) < 0.001
≤ 0.7 1 (5.3%) 55 (93.2%)
Median (min; max) 0.99 (0.28–1.59) 0.41 (0.11–0.96) < 0.001
Lac + Lip 1.3/tCr < 1.6 12 (63.2%) 14 (23.7%) 0.004
≥ 1.6 7 (36.8%) 45 (76.3%)
Median (min; max) 1.13 (0.07–10.65) 2.69 (0.40–15.63) 0.005
Lac + Lip 0.9–1.3/tCr < 2.0 13 (68.4%) 13 (22.0%) < 0.001
≥ 2.0 6 (31.6%) 46 (78.0%)
Median (min; max) 1.33 (0.08–12.35) 3.26 (0.54–17.42) 0.004
ADCmean > 1313 19 (100.0%) 1 (1.7%) < 0.001
≤ 1313 0 58 (98.3%)
Median (min; max) 1372 (1317–1476) 1155(756–1344) < 0.001