Table 1.

Regions showing different resting state activity patterns between survivors and controls.

	ROI	x,y,za	Peak t valueb	Number of voxelsc	BAd	Regione	Hemi sphere
ROIs in RECN
1	rFM	27,30,39	+ 3.22	13	9	Middle frontal	R
2	rP	42,− 30, 48	+ 4.59	13	2	Postcentral	R
3	rFS1	15, 36,51	− 4.15	10	9	Superior frontal	R
ROIs in LECN
4	lFIO	− 30, 24, − 15	+ 5.24	20	47	Inferior frontal	L
5	lP	− 18,3, 9	+ 4.56	23	48	Putamen	L
ROI in SN
6	lSM	− 9, 21, 60	− 4.68	21	6	Supplementary motor	L
ROIs in ADMN
7	AC	0,33, − 6	− 3.52	20	32,11	Anterior cingulum	L/R
8	CA	0, 9, 3	− 4.52	21	25	Caudate	L/R
9	rFS2	30, 63, 9	+ 3.74	20	10	Superior frontal	R
10	lFS	− 30, 66, 15	+ 3.63	14	10	Superior frontal	L
11	lINS	− 36, − 6, 12	+ 5.47	58	48	Insula	L

No Significant difference ROI in PDMN.

^aPeak coordinates of MNI brain atlas. MNI = Montreal Neurological Institute.

^bThe peak t value, ‘+’ indicates the increased z-score in survivors, and ‘-’ indicates the decreased z-score in survivors.

^cThese clusters were tested for cluster-level FWE correction p < 0.01 and the AlphaSim estimation indicated that clusters with 10 contiguous voxels would achieve an effective FWE threshold p < 0.01 in RSN1, and 13, 13, 11 in RSN2, RSN3, RSN4, respectively. Voxel size = 3 × 3 × 3.

^dBrodmann's area, double checked with the xjview software ((http://www.alivelearn.net/xjview/).

^eThe brain regions were referenced to the Automated Anatomical Labeling (AAL), and also double checked with the xjview software.