Skip to main content
. 2016 May 20;4(2):e49. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.5436

Table 2.

Description of study, sample, and intervention characteristics of 20 included studies.

Characteristic Variable Summary Statistic
Study

Publication year, median (range) 2013 (2005-2015)

Data collection year, median (range) 2009 (2004-2013)
Sample

Demographics

Sample size, initial/final 15,593/12,477

Women, mean % (SDa) 54 (20)

Age, mean (SD) 29 (8)

Race, mean % White (SD), kb=9 69 (29)

Region of sample, k (%)

Europe 9 (45)

North America 6 (30)

Oceania 3 (15)

Asia 2 (10)
Methods

Recruitment method, k

Web-based 6 (30%)

Offline 8 (40%)

Web-based and offline 6 (30%)

Enrollment Procedures, k (%)

Electronic 6 (30%)

Phone 1 (5%)

In-person 5 (25%)

Multiple 8 (40%)

Study design, k (%)

Random assignment of groups 2 (10)

Matching then random assignment 8 (40)

True randomization 10 (50)

Treatment standardized 20 (100)

Pre- and post-test, k (%)

Pretest post-test design 20 (100)

Follow-up rate, k (%)

85%-100% completed 9 (45)

70%-84% completed 6 (30)

<70% completed 5 (25)

Follow-up length, k (%)

6 months or longer 3 (15)

3-5 months 3 (15)

Less than 3 months 14 (70)

Retention, k (%)

Withdrawal/drop-outs reported 20 (100)

Attrition, cases lost to follow-up considered 20 (100)

Data collection, k (%)

Anonymous 1 (5)

Collateral verification 1 (5)

Used objective measures (≥50% cases) 7 (35)

Independent/double-blinding 11 (55)

Data treatment, k (%)

Intent-to-treat, reported and used 20 (100)

Data analyses, k (%)

Appropriate for the study design 2 (10)

Controlled for baseline/other covariates 18 (90)

Single versus multiple site study design, k (%)

Multisite, replication at ≥2 sites 0 (0)
Intervention

Theory used to guide research, k (%) 19 (86)

Intervention duration (days), median (range) 87 (5-378)

Intervention delivery, k (%)

Text messages 11 (50)

Text messages + other delivery format 11 (50)

Text messages sent, median (range) 140 (14-280)

Frequency of text messages, kc

Low (<1/week), fixed-dose 1

High (>1/week), fixed-dose 4

Decreasing 6

Varied 13

User selected 3

Communication flow, k (%)

One-way texts 2 (9)

Two-way texts 20 (91)

Other Intervention Content (k=11)

N sessions, median (range) 2 (1-232)

Other Intervention Delivery, kc

In-person 2

Facilitated by computer/technology 1

Computer/technology 6

Print materials 2

Phone 4

Tailored and Targeted Intervention

Intervention content tailored 21 (95)

Intervention content targeted 16 (73)

Other Intervention Content, k (%)

Decisional balance exercise 12 (55)

Personalized feedback 16 (73)

Self-efficacy 20 (91)

Self-management skills 22 (100)

Goal-setting/harm prevention plans 19 (86)

Counseling provided, k (%)c

In-person 1 (5)

Phone/voice 3 (14)

Computer 3 (14)

Social support, k (%)

Any 12 (55)

Individual 11

Group 1

Biomedical intervention, k (%)

Any 9 (41)

Recommended 7

Provided 2

Treatment fidelity, k (%)

15 (68)
Controls

Type of control, k (%)

WL/NT/AOd 2 (10)

Irrelevant content, time-matched 2 (10)

Irrelevant content, not time-matched 4 (20)

Relevant content, time-matched 2 (10)

Relevant content, not time-matched 10 (50)

Control delivery, k (%)

Text messages 6 (33)

Text messages + other delivery format 4 (22)

Other delivery format 8 (44)

aStandard deviation.

bNumber of studies.

cMultiple categories were possible.

dWait-list/no treatment/assessment only control.