Skip to main content
. 2016 May 20;4(2):e49. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.5436

Table 3.

Summary effect sizes and homogeneity statistics (random effects assumptions) at the final post-intervention assessment for smoking abstinence and quit attempts.

Analyses Outcome ka ORb (95% CIc) Qd P Value I 2e (95% CI)
Intent-to-Treat

Point prevalence, 24 hours 2 2.60 (1.26, 5.37) 0.14 .704 0 (0, 100)

Point prevalence, 7 days 16 1.38 (1.22, 1.55) 18.34 .245 18 (0, 55)

Point prevalence, 30 days 9 1.52 (1.34, 1.71) 5.72 .678 0 (0, 63)

Continuous abstinence 7 1.63 (1.19, 2.24) 11.31 .079 47 (0, 78)

Prolonged abstinence 3 1.57 (1.19, 2.08) 0.80 .671 0 (0, 89)

Repeated point prevalence 3 2.33 (1.61, 3.38) 1.52 .467 0 (0, 58)

Quit attempt 5 1.15 (0.84, 1.57) 4.35 .360 8 (0, 47)
Complete case

Point prevalence, 24 hours 2 3.62 (1.46, 8.99) 0.02 .895 0 (0, 100)

Point prevalence, 7 days 15 1.43 (1.31, 1.56) 13.55 .484 0 (0, 0)

Point prevalence, 30 days 9 1.57 (1.39, 1.77) 7.47 .487 0 (0, 100)

Continuous abstinence 7 1.92 (1.55, 2.38) 6.88 .332 13 (0, 56)

Prolonged abstinence 3 1.57 (1.19, 2.07) 0.45 .798 0 (0, 95)

Repeated point prevalence 3 2.33 (1.60, 3.39) 1.41 .495 0 (0, 57)

Quit attempt 5 1.33 (0.83, 2.13) 4.72 .317 15 (0, 60)

aNumber of interventions

bOdds ratios; greater than 1 indicate that the estimated effects favor the text messaging interventions relative to controls.

cconfidence interval.

dHomogeneity statistic.

eConsistency of effect sizes.