Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Vet J. 2016 Apr 20;212:83–89. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.04.009

Table 1.

Signalment and biochemical data for study groups.

Ohio State University (OSU) group
University of Minnesota group
Normal (14 dogs) HTG (16 dogs) Normal (9 dogs) HTG (18 dogs)
Age 2.1 ± 1.3 8.5 ± 3.9* 9.2 ± 1.4 10.3 ± 1.6
Sex 6 MI, 1 MU, 6 FI, 1 FU 7 MN, 7 FS, 1 FI, 1 FU* 5 MN, 4 FS 10 MN, 8 FS
BCS 3 (2–4) 3 (2–5) 3 (3–4) 3 (3–4)
TG 45 (4–69) 575 (108–5510)* 68 (14–81) 303 (87–2089)*
Cholesterol 209 ± 71 310 ± 98* 228 ± 22 327 ± 109*
UPCa 0.1 (0.1–0.2) 0.6 (0.1–5.7)* 0.1 (0.1–0.4) 0.6 (0.1–4.8)*
 <0.5 14 (1.00) 4 (0.25) 9 (1.00) 8 (0.44)
 0.5–0.9 0 (0.00) 2 (0.125) 0 (0.00) 2 (0.11)
 1.0–1.9 0 (0.00) 2 (0.125) 0 (0.00) 1 (0.06)
 ≥2.0 0 (0.00) 4 (0.25) 0 (0.00) 7 (0.39)

HTG, hypertriglyceridemia; MN, male neutered; MI, male intact; MU, male unreported reproductive status; FS, female spayed; FI, female intact; FU, female unreported reproductive status; BCS, body condition score (1–5 scale); TG, serum triglyceride concentration; UPC, urine protein-to-creatinine ratio.

Values are mean ± standard deviation for age (years) and cholesterol (mg/dL), median (range) for BCS, TG (mg/dL) and UPC, and count (proportion) for UPC subcategories. Significant differences between dogs with and without HTG within study groups are denoted with

*

P < 0.05.

a

UPC data is only reported for 12/16 dogs in the OSU group with HTG; see the text for explanation.