Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 2;6(6):e010981. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010981

Table 3.

Mean part-worth utility values (rescaled as zero centred) for the n=1004 respondents

Attributes and levels Mean part-worth utility SE t Values Mean significantly different from 0
MD's clinical risk estimate
 Low risk −29.81 2.55 −11.68 ***
 Intermediate risk 0.20 0.89 0.22 NS
 High risk 29.61 2.48 11.95 ***
Trust in MD
 Do not trust −25.54 0.98 −26.10 ***
 Somewhat trust −0.73 0.67 −1.09 NS
 Totally trust 26.27 0.92 28.55 ***
Likelihood of temporary SE
 Low likelihood 2.47 0.75 3.27 **
 Moderate likelihood 7.55 0.60 12.60 ***
 High likelihood −10.02 0.75 −13.34 ***
Likelihood of permanent SE
 Low likelihood 33.75 1.10 30.59 ***
 Moderate likelihood 12.25 0.76 16.13 ***
 High likelihood −46.00 1.22 −37.66 ***
GEP score, likely benefit from chemotherapy
 GEP not available −17.34 0.86 −20.18 ***
 9, Low benefit −43.39 1.21 −35.73 ***
 22, Uncertain benefit −6.83 0.89 −7.65 ***
 44, High benefit 67.56 1.52 44.48 ***
 General preference for chemotherapy vs no chemotherapy −49.53 5.74 −8.63 ***

Conducting paired t-test among attribute levels within each attribute, all pairs were significantly different at p<0.001.

**Significant at p<0.01; ***Significant at p<0.001.

GEP, gene expression profiling; MD, cancer treatment doctor; NS, not significant; SE, side effects.