Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jul 15.
Published in final edited form as: J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2016 Apr 22;126:26–33. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2016.04.028

Table 6.

Comparison of UV and MS results for silymarin extracts. Percent composition of compounds 18 in various commercial silymarin extracts.

Extract Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Madaus UV 67 2.71 (0.01) 1.89 (0.02) 8.63 (0.14) 11.00 (0.03) 13.91 (0.02) 19.49 (0.08) 5.48 (0.02) 3.46 (0.02)
37501 MS 70 2.65 (0.04) 1.95 (0.05) 8.79 (0.07) 14.18 (0.10) 13.85 (0.15) 19.38 (0.36) 5.58 (0.05) 3.53 (0.07)
Madaus UV 63 2.84 (0.04) 0.54 (0.01) 13.40 (0.09) 1.43 (0.02) 15.29 (0.05) 22.62 (0.13) 4.56 (0.03) 1.97 (0.02)
286061 MS 62 2.81 (0.08) 0.52 (0.04) 13.33 (0.09) 1.44 (0.09) 15.17 (0.20) ALR 4.64 (0.07) 1.94 (0.03)
Indena UV 56 4.13 (0.02) 1.30 (0.01) 11.53 (0.06) 5.48 (0.04) 10.16 (0.02) 15.94 (0.11) 4.917 (0.001) 2.50 (0.02)
27691 MS 57 4.13 (0.05) 1.22 (0.05) 11.60 (0.05) 7.02 (0.01) 10.29 (0.11) 15.68 (0.04) 4.92 (0.14) 2.52 (0.01)
Sigma UV 46 3.17 (0.01) 0.84 (0.01) 10.15 (0.05) 3.27 (0.04) 9.17 (0.04) 13.60 (0.04) 3.84 (0.01) 1.97 (0.04)
BCBJ0393V MS 47 3.00 (0.08) 0.89 (0.06) 10.25 (0.05) 4.05 (0.07) 9.20 (0.07) 13.93 (0.20) 3.87 (0.07) 1.99 (0.09)
Sigma UV 54 2.60 (0.03) 0.437 (0.003) 13.14 (0.05) 0.83 (0.02) 12.50 (0.03) 18.42 (0.06) 4.20 (0.01) 1.62 (0.01)
05503PG MS 54 2.61 (0.01) 0.40 (0.02) 13.08 (0.05) 0.82 (0.05) 12.51 (0.06) 18.49 (0.24) 4.22 (0.08) 1.70 (0.04)

Total percentage of the silymarin extract contributed by the eight compounds being measured in this study

Shaded values for percent composition indicate a statistically significant difference (at the 95% confidence interval) between the percent composition measured by MS versus UV detection according to the t-test. Unshaded values showed no statistically significant difference between MS and UV data.

ALR = above linear range of the MS detection method

BQL = below quantitation limit

ND = not detected