Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Control Release. 2016 Apr 15;232:83–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.04.019

Table 1.

Characteristics of different formulations of nanoparticles

NP Formulations Diameter by DLS (nm)/PI* (Range) Diameter by AFM (nm)** (Range) ζ-Potential (mV)*
Anionic NPs (without dye) 164 ± 5/0.055 (139–189 nm) 112 ± 5 (65–175 nm) −18 ± 2
Dye-loaded anionic NPs 168 ± 3/0.035 (159–177 nm) ND −17 ± 2
Neutral NPs (without dye) 152 ± 4/0.020 (136–168 nm) 112 ± 4 (73–178 nm) −2 ± 3
Dye-loaded neutral NPs 148 ± 2/0.022 (144–152 nm) ND −3 ± 3
Cationic NPs (without dye) 162 ± 23/0.088 (139–185 nm) 91 ± 4 (44–136 nm) 13 ± 1
Dye-loaded cationic NPs 169 ± 8/0.063 (161–177 nm) ND 12 ± 1
PTX-loaded NPs 151 ± 6/0.028 (145–157 nm) ND −2 ± 3
*

Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation; n = 3.

**

Diameter by AFM was measured using section profile analysis of 40 individual NPs.

ND, Not determined; nm, nanometer.