Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 6.
Published in final edited form as: Gastric Cancer. 2014 Apr 21;18(2):280–287. doi: 10.1007/s10120-014-0370-2

Table 2.

Correlation between hypermethylation in DNA repair genes and clinicopathological characteristics of 102 gastric cancer cases

Clinicopathological parameters (n) Frequency of methylation, n (%)
CHFR MLH1 MGMT RASSFA1
Gender
    Male (72) 24 (33.3) 19 (26.4) 4 (5.6) 9 (12.5)
    Female (30) 11 (36.7) 3 (10.0) 6 (20.0) 4 (13.3)
        p 0.747 0.067 0.061 1.000
Age (years)
    n < 60 (73) 26 (35.6) 14 (19.2) 9 (12.3) 9 (12.3)
    n ≥ 60 (29) 9 (31.0) 8 (27.6) 1 (3.4) 4 (13.8)
        p 0.660 0.352 0.321 1.000
Tumor histology
    Intestinal type (64) 22 (34.3) 13 (20.3) 7 (10.9) 7 (10.9)
    Diffused and mixed type (33) 13 (34.2) 9 (23.6) 3 (7.9) 6 (15.8)
        p 0.938 0.638 0.646 1.445
Differentiation
    Well and moderately differentiated (29) 9 (31.0) 3 (10.3) 3 (17.6) 1 (5.9)
    Poorly differentiated (73) 26 (35.6) 19 (26.0) 7 (8.2) 12 (14.1)
        p 0.660 0.082 0.457 0.595
Tumor size
    d < 5 (45) 13 (28.9) 12 (26.7) 5 (11.1) 4 (8.9)
    d ≥ 5 (57) 22 (38.6) 10 (17.5) 5 (8.8) 9 (15.8)
        p 0.305 0.266 0.953 0.299
Tumor invasion
    T1–T2 (13) 7 (53.8) 3 (23.1) 2 (15.4) 1 (7.7)
    T3–T4 (89) 28 (31.5) 19 (21.3) 8 (9.0) 12 (13.5)
        p 0.112 0.887 0.822 0.889
Lymph node metastasis
    N0–N1 (36) 10 (27.8) 10 (27.8) 2 (5.6) 4 (11.1)
    N1–N3 (66) 25 (37.9) 12 (18.2) 8 (12.5) 9 (14.3)
        p 0.304 0.260 0.473 0.956
Peritoneal or distant metastasis
    M0 (94) 30 (31.9) 21 (22.3) 8 (8.5) 11 (11.7)
    M1 (8) 5 (62.5) 1 (12.5) 2 (25) 2 (25)
        p 0.080 0.516 0.375 0.596
Tumor stage
    I–II (19) 6 (31.6) 6 (31.6) 2 (10.5) 3 (15.8)
    III–IV (83) 29 (34.9) 16 (19.3) 8 (9.6) 10 (12.0)
        p 0.781 0.240 0.100 0.952
Vessel invasion
    Negative (72) 25 (34.7) 15 (20.8) 9 (12.5) 9 (12.5)
    Positive (30) 10 (33.3) 7 (23.3) 1 (3.3) 4 (13.3)
        p 0.893 0.780 0.292 1.000

Pathological tumor invasion, lymph node status, distant metastasis status, and TNM stage of gastric cancer were evaluated according to American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC), 7th edition, 2009. Statistical analysis was performed by χ2 or Fisher exact test

p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant