Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jun 6.
Published in final edited form as: Gastric Cancer. 2014 Apr 21;18(2):280–287. doi: 10.1007/s10120-014-0370-2

Table 3.

Associations between clinicopathological factors and overall survival among docetaxel-treated gastric cancer patients

Clinicopathological factors Short time survival, hazard ratio 95 % confidence interval p value
CHFR
    CHFR unmethylation 1.000
    CHFR methylation 0.243 0.069–0.859 0.028*
Gender
    Male 1.000
    Female 2.115 0.555–8.062 0.272
Age (years)
    n < 60 1.000
    n ≥ 60 1.215 0.289–5.113 0.790
Tumor histology
    Intestinal type 1.000
    Diffused and mixed type 0.815 0.391–1.701 0.586
Differentiation
    Well and moderately differentiated 1.000
    Poorly differentiated 1.997 0.440–9.061 0.370
Tumor size
    d < 5 1.000
    d ≥ 5 0.351 0.107–1.149 0.084
Tumor invasion
    T1–T2 1.000
    T3–T4 2.729 0.527–14.121 0.231
Lymph node metastasis
    N0–N1 1.000
    N2–N3 1.550 0.785–3.060 0.206
Peritoneal or distant metastasis
    M0 1.000
    M1 4.048 0.256–64.064 0.321
Tumor stage
    I–II 1.000
    II–IV 0.300 0.038–2.353 0.252
Vessel invasion
    Negative 1.000
    Positive 0.837 0.200–3.508 0.808

The multivariate Cox regression model showed that CHFR methylation was associated with a decreased (75.7 %) risk of shorter overall survival compared to CHFR unmethylation (HR 0.243, 95 % CI, 0.069–0.859, p = 0.028; Table 3) in docetaxel-treated gastric cancer patients. No significant association between the other clinicopathological factors and overall survival was observed